Malik Siraj Akbar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Malik Siraj Akbar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This BLP, created by a SPA Jarisful ( talk · contribs), appears to have been authored by the subject themselves, as he's an experienced editor. This BLP is very promotional in nature, citing unreliable and even unacceptable sources, such as opinion pieces penned by the subject themselves and such pieces are generally not admissible as references. While the subject has garnered some press coverage, but it's too common for journalists to get some sort of press attention on every one of them. To me, this one doesn't appear to meet the criteria outlined in WP:JOURNALIST as well WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Politics, Internet, Pakistan, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP but the article needs to be improved by removing unsourced and primary sources. -- Twinkle1990 ( talk) 16:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- But as I said the subject doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or even WP:JOURNALIST so what's the point of cleaning up BLP ? --— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 16:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Malik Siraj Akbar
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Malik Siraj Akbar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This BLP, created by a SPA Jarisful ( talk · contribs), appears to have been authored by the subject themselves, as he's an experienced editor. This BLP is very promotional in nature, citing unreliable and even unacceptable sources, such as opinion pieces penned by the subject themselves and such pieces are generally not admissible as references. While the subject has garnered some press coverage, but it's too common for journalists to get some sort of press attention on every one of them. To me, this one doesn't appear to meet the criteria outlined in WP:JOURNALIST as well WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Politics, Internet, Pakistan, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP but the article needs to be improved by removing unsourced and primary sources. -- Twinkle1990 ( talk) 16:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- But as I said the subject doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or even WP:JOURNALIST so what's the point of cleaning up BLP ? --— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 16:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)