The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
While a very notable companion in spin-off material, I cannot find any evidence of SIGCOV. A quick search for sources yields only one or two potential results, which aren't enough to build an article off of. As it stands, the article fails SIGCOV. A redirect to either the Companion article or the list of Doctor Who Supporting Characters article seems the best option here.
Pokelego999 (
talk) 19:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect Not enough sources exist to make an article. I have no opinion on which redirect target would be better.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 16:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep While a lot of the audio companions might not rise to this, as her stories were broadcast on BB7 I believe there has been coverage, such as
here, which should be incorporated.
Frond Dishlock (
talk) 02:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Can you provide more than just one source? While this one does have some commentary on the character, most of the other sources I found during my search were either trivial mentions, listicles, or didn't go in depth on her. Unless more can be provided that adequately discuss the character, I don't feel it's enough to justify the article's separate existence.
Pokelego999 (
talk) 12:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect not enough coverage to pass
WP:SIGCOV. Can't make an encyclopedic article without it.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 20:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to get a specific redirect target from y'all. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)reply
As nominator, perhaps the Companion article? She seems to be more notable in that role than as a Supporting Character.
Pokelego999 (
talk) 15:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect It is clear there is not enough
WP:RS coverage to merit an article, but a redirect may be appropriate.
Go4thProsper (
talk) 15:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
While a very notable companion in spin-off material, I cannot find any evidence of SIGCOV. A quick search for sources yields only one or two potential results, which aren't enough to build an article off of. As it stands, the article fails SIGCOV. A redirect to either the Companion article or the list of Doctor Who Supporting Characters article seems the best option here.
Pokelego999 (
talk) 19:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect Not enough sources exist to make an article. I have no opinion on which redirect target would be better.
QuicoleJR (
talk) 16:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep While a lot of the audio companions might not rise to this, as her stories were broadcast on BB7 I believe there has been coverage, such as
here, which should be incorporated.
Frond Dishlock (
talk) 02:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Can you provide more than just one source? While this one does have some commentary on the character, most of the other sources I found during my search were either trivial mentions, listicles, or didn't go in depth on her. Unless more can be provided that adequately discuss the character, I don't feel it's enough to justify the article's separate existence.
Pokelego999 (
talk) 12:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect not enough coverage to pass
WP:SIGCOV. Can't make an encyclopedic article without it.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 20:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to get a specific redirect target from y'all. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)reply
As nominator, perhaps the Companion article? She seems to be more notable in that role than as a Supporting Character.
Pokelego999 (
talk) 15:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete/Redirect It is clear there is not enough
WP:RS coverage to merit an article, but a redirect may be appropriate.
Go4thProsper (
talk) 15:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.