- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 01:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Louis John Gardella
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Louis John Gardella ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. The article baselessly claims that this person is notable for being the husband of a barely-notable actress. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I can not understand how this individual would be considered notable to anyone other than family and friends. Fails WP:GNG. Fails WP:BASIC. Fails everything. I am not even sure what the rationale for the creation of the article was. He was once married (per article) to a "b-movie actress" and that is a claim to notability? ExRat ( talk) 00:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete Fails in WP:GNG. Akronowner ( talk) 16:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)- Blocked sock. MER-C 12:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete being married to an actress is not a default sign of notability, and nothing else here is either. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 01:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Louis John Gardella
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Louis John Gardella ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. The article baselessly claims that this person is notable for being the husband of a barely-notable actress. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I can not understand how this individual would be considered notable to anyone other than family and friends. Fails WP:GNG. Fails WP:BASIC. Fails everything. I am not even sure what the rationale for the creation of the article was. He was once married (per article) to a "b-movie actress" and that is a claim to notability? ExRat ( talk) 00:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete Fails in WP:GNG. Akronowner ( talk) 16:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)- Blocked sock. MER-C 12:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete being married to an actress is not a default sign of notability, and nothing else here is either. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.