The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete After five years, they've never actually created a game, so this is more notable for being yet another gaming industry money effigy pit more than for its actual value as a game studio. Nate•(
chatter) 20:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The studio deserves a page. They've just announced their first game.
Wariorio10 (
talk) 21:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Announcing a game doesn't give you a free pass to have an article about your game and studio, since Wikipedia is not for advertising spam - it needs an encyclopedic reason to exist.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 19:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)reply
People come to Wikipedia for information. It doesn't matter if it's a little bit of information or not, as long as the article provides accurate information, it deserves to exist. This page can be expanded in the future over time.
Wariorio10 (
talk) 22:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Accuracy alone is insufficient for inclusion.
Cortador (
talk) 09:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or Draftify given the announced game may come to fruition. But this obviously attracts
WP:GNG. Put it this way, if the studio's notability hinges on the studio's announcement of Last Sentinel, an article for Last Sentinel itself would be draftified for being
WP:TOOSOON. Pre-release coverage for things yet to materialise should always be dealt with caution as the coverage is largely reliant about what the studio is saying about itself. This is indicated by the presser-style news articles, and inclusion of interviews and YouTube channels. The studio just hasn't reached a point yet where anything can be said about it other than what the studio is announcing and telling media itself.
VRXCES (
talk) 01:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge with Tencent Games. The studio isn't notable by itself. One announced game won't change that, and sources are more likely to report on that game than on the studio specifically.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete After five years, they've never actually created a game, so this is more notable for being yet another gaming industry money effigy pit more than for its actual value as a game studio. Nate•(
chatter) 20:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The studio deserves a page. They've just announced their first game.
Wariorio10 (
talk) 21:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Announcing a game doesn't give you a free pass to have an article about your game and studio, since Wikipedia is not for advertising spam - it needs an encyclopedic reason to exist.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 19:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)reply
People come to Wikipedia for information. It doesn't matter if it's a little bit of information or not, as long as the article provides accurate information, it deserves to exist. This page can be expanded in the future over time.
Wariorio10 (
talk) 22:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Accuracy alone is insufficient for inclusion.
Cortador (
talk) 09:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or Draftify given the announced game may come to fruition. But this obviously attracts
WP:GNG. Put it this way, if the studio's notability hinges on the studio's announcement of Last Sentinel, an article for Last Sentinel itself would be draftified for being
WP:TOOSOON. Pre-release coverage for things yet to materialise should always be dealt with caution as the coverage is largely reliant about what the studio is saying about itself. This is indicated by the presser-style news articles, and inclusion of interviews and YouTube channels. The studio just hasn't reached a point yet where anything can be said about it other than what the studio is announcing and telling media itself.
VRXCES (
talk) 01:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge with Tencent Games. The studio isn't notable by itself. One announced game won't change that, and sources are more likely to report on that game than on the studio specifically.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.