The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{( spin me / revolutions)} 18:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Leher

Leher (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last AFD discussion was not proper. It fails WP:ORG Just having coverage doesn't mean it is passing notability. Lordofhunter ( talk) 21:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and India. Lordofhunter ( talk) 21:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Keep. The previous AFD can be seen here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leher App. Six people gave sensible reasons for keeping the article, pointing out various instances of significant coverage in reliable sources. These reasons are still applicable.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Keep - See Toddy1's nice argument. This guy already won a "Keep" vote, why do double jeopardy? KatoKungLee ( talk) 16:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Comment The sources shared in the last afd was not meeting WP:ORG, the actual guidelines for companies & Organisation.

Gadgets360 news is about how to sign up, and clearly a PR Driven material. ET News, quint [1] are generic about the Indian app Industry. TOI source is not independent, the article is full of quotes of the companies' spokesperson. All other sources like RepublicWorld, Everythingexperiemential & podcast sources are far from reliability. Please read WP:ORG and share reliable, independent sources which are significant. Lordofhunter ( talk) 09:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply

News stories about any company are going to quote company spokesmen.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply

And those "Stories" are clearly not independent, right? and consider as PR Material or annocement Lordofhunter ( talk) 04:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The person from the company telling you a thing is important, doesn't make it important. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:ORG, The most notable thing in linked articles is this startup was accepted to the Google For Startups accelerator which whilst impressive isn't notable MetricMaster ( talk) 08:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC) This user has made 47 edits to Wikipedia. Their contribution history shows that 38 of these were to AFD discussions. The account exists for votestacking and has been blocked. reply

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC) reply

* Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. SuperSharanya ( talk) 13:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Sourcing found in the previous AfD was more than adequate. Quoting someone does not automatically void independence. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 18:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete Brief mentions of this site, nothing extensive nor in-depth about it. The last AfD appears to be about the company, this is about their piece of software. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.