From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kepler-23. History is thereunder for a merge, if desired Star Mississippi 23:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Kepler-23d

Kepler-23d (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Kepler-23 as per WP:DWMP. Subject fails to meet notability for astronomical objects. Did WP:BEFORE and Kepler-23d is not the subject of significant scholarship at this time. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Comment What's the standard for notability for astronomical objects?
Jothefiredragon ( talk) 04:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Jothefiredragon here you go WP:NASTRO and WP:DWMP. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kepler-23. History is thereunder for a merge, if desired Star Mississippi 23:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Kepler-23d

Kepler-23d (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Kepler-23 as per WP:DWMP. Subject fails to meet notability for astronomical objects. Did WP:BEFORE and Kepler-23d is not the subject of significant scholarship at this time. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Comment What's the standard for notability for astronomical objects?
Jothefiredragon ( talk) 04:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Jothefiredragon here you go WP:NASTRO and WP:DWMP. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook