From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted CSD G5 Creation by banned or blocked users. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Memohwiki Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Justin Jin

Justin Jin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains substantial amounts of hoax content and fails WP:GNG/ WP:NBASIC. The sources in the article as of the time of posting do not demonstrate that this person passes WP:GNG/ WP:NBASIC and can be described as follows:

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
The New York Times (1) Yes The New York Times is independent of Jin. Yes The New York Times is a reputble Newsorg. No A "Justin Jin" is mentioned as having been a photographer, but he's a professional photojournalist, not someone who was seven years old at the time of the article's publication. This man is not the Wikipeida article's subject. No
The New York Times (2) Yes The New York Times is independent of Jin. Yes The New York Times is a reputble Newsorg. No Again, this article contains a trivial mention of a different Justin Jin, and the article was published when our Wikipedia article's subject was 1 year old. No
National Geographic ~ Author page on a neworg's website. Not independent of the person the author page is about (but that's a different person than this article's subject entirely) ~ WP:ABOUTSELF No That is the page for this Justin Jin, not the Justin Jin who this Wikipedia article is about. No
The Guardian ~ First-person photo essay, but not written by this article's subject. Yes The Guardian is green on WP:RSN. No Again, this Justin Jin is not this Justin Jin. No
South China Morning Post ~ Author page on a neworg's website. Not independent of the person the author page is about (but that's a different person than this article's subject entirely) ~ The New York Times is a reputble Newsorg. No This is about the photojournalist born in 1974, not the YouTuber born in 2006. No
The Vach on YouTube No This article's subject founded and operates The Vach. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF ? Moot as clearly non-independent. No
Social Blade Yes Why not? Yes Seems fine No This is a database entry. No
Voyage LA Magazine No Direct interview with Jin published in an online PR publication. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF; this is effectively a press release. Yes Indeed, this is about Jin. No
The Vach profile of Justin Jin No This is his self-published profile on a website he runs. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF ? Moot as clearly non-independent. No
Box of Colour on YouTube No This is part of the 50mMidas Media collective, which Jin owns and operates. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF. ? Moot as clearly non-independent. No
Preneur on YouTube ? Unclear to me ~ WP:ABOUTSELF; YouTube profile No Jin is not mentioned once. No
"We faked YouTube's oldest video" on The Vach No Jin owns and operates The Vach ~ WP:ABOUTSELF ? Moot as clearly non-independent No
Vice/Motherboard on TikTok Yes Why not? ~ Vice is WP:MREL at WP:RSP, and this is its TikTok channel No Jin's name is not so much as mentioned in this. No
The Independent Yes Standard U.K. WP:NEWSORG Yes Standard U.K. WP:NEWSORG No Jin's name is not so much as mentioned once. No
The Verge Yes Why not? Yes Seems fine. No Jin is not so much as mentioned by name once. No
The Times of India Yes Why not? ~ See WP:TOI No Jin's name is not so much as mentioned in passing. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}.

After conducting an online search, I was unable to find additional coverage of this individual that would contribute towards passing WP:GNG. Additionally, several links were used to support hoaxes (the NYT, NatGeo, The Guardian, and SCMP refs refer to a different Justin Jin; this article's subject is not the same born in 2006 per their IMDB Pro page), which I have since removed as such. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 08:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted CSD G5 Creation by banned or blocked users. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Memohwiki Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Catfish Jim and the soapdish 13:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Justin Jin

Justin Jin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains substantial amounts of hoax content and fails WP:GNG/ WP:NBASIC. The sources in the article as of the time of posting do not demonstrate that this person passes WP:GNG/ WP:NBASIC and can be described as follows:

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
The New York Times (1) Yes The New York Times is independent of Jin. Yes The New York Times is a reputble Newsorg. No A "Justin Jin" is mentioned as having been a photographer, but he's a professional photojournalist, not someone who was seven years old at the time of the article's publication. This man is not the Wikipeida article's subject. No
The New York Times (2) Yes The New York Times is independent of Jin. Yes The New York Times is a reputble Newsorg. No Again, this article contains a trivial mention of a different Justin Jin, and the article was published when our Wikipedia article's subject was 1 year old. No
National Geographic ~ Author page on a neworg's website. Not independent of the person the author page is about (but that's a different person than this article's subject entirely) ~ WP:ABOUTSELF No That is the page for this Justin Jin, not the Justin Jin who this Wikipedia article is about. No
The Guardian ~ First-person photo essay, but not written by this article's subject. Yes The Guardian is green on WP:RSN. No Again, this Justin Jin is not this Justin Jin. No
South China Morning Post ~ Author page on a neworg's website. Not independent of the person the author page is about (but that's a different person than this article's subject entirely) ~ The New York Times is a reputble Newsorg. No This is about the photojournalist born in 1974, not the YouTuber born in 2006. No
The Vach on YouTube No This article's subject founded and operates The Vach. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF ? Moot as clearly non-independent. No
Social Blade Yes Why not? Yes Seems fine No This is a database entry. No
Voyage LA Magazine No Direct interview with Jin published in an online PR publication. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF; this is effectively a press release. Yes Indeed, this is about Jin. No
The Vach profile of Justin Jin No This is his self-published profile on a website he runs. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF ? Moot as clearly non-independent. No
Box of Colour on YouTube No This is part of the 50mMidas Media collective, which Jin owns and operates. ~ WP:ABOUTSELF. ? Moot as clearly non-independent. No
Preneur on YouTube ? Unclear to me ~ WP:ABOUTSELF; YouTube profile No Jin is not mentioned once. No
"We faked YouTube's oldest video" on The Vach No Jin owns and operates The Vach ~ WP:ABOUTSELF ? Moot as clearly non-independent No
Vice/Motherboard on TikTok Yes Why not? ~ Vice is WP:MREL at WP:RSP, and this is its TikTok channel No Jin's name is not so much as mentioned in this. No
The Independent Yes Standard U.K. WP:NEWSORG Yes Standard U.K. WP:NEWSORG No Jin's name is not so much as mentioned once. No
The Verge Yes Why not? Yes Seems fine. No Jin is not so much as mentioned by name once. No
The Times of India Yes Why not? ~ See WP:TOI No Jin's name is not so much as mentioned in passing. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}.

After conducting an online search, I was unable to find additional coverage of this individual that would contribute towards passing WP:GNG. Additionally, several links were used to support hoaxes (the NYT, NatGeo, The Guardian, and SCMP refs refer to a different Justin Jin; this article's subject is not the same born in 2006 per their IMDB Pro page), which I have since removed as such. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 08:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook