- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) dud hhr Contribs 19:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Jay-Jay Feeney
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jay-Jay Feeney ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am sorry but I do believe that sources here are just puff pieces. Should be relooked at. Looks like it is written by the subject themselves.
- Update - I am looking through this article. The previous sources are from the subjects twitter and published book. They are not reliable sources. The rest of the sources that are still there are just from news outlets, similar to a tabloid. So where does all the rest of the information come from. It seems to be written by the subject themselves or an agent. But it's not a notable article unless someone can prove me wrong. DominikRuben ( talk) 11:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Easily passes WP:GNG. https://www.google.com/search?q=jay-jay+feeney&sxsrf=ALeKk01xm6z-lRPlTrOTq4PtY-9Y3bWOeg:1622408923474&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjgl8GcqPLwAhXa4jgGHVxyDmgQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1280&bih=633&dpr=1 Nexus000 ( talk) 21:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Very notable figure in NZ radio and media. The article has been reworked since nomination to provide evidence of this. Ajf773 ( talk) 23:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. I think it's poor form to nominate an article for deletion and simultaneously remove 25% of the content. pburka ( talk) 00:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC, based on the sources in and added to the article, and other sources that appear to WP:NEXIST; Feeney is a high profile radio star for over two decades and has authored two books. Beccaynr ( talk) 01:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Also, multiple wins at the New Zealand Radio Awards. Beccaynr ( talk) 20:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Someone that knows how, close this as keep and WP:SNOW. Nominator has since been banned. — NZFC (talk) (cont) 01:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) dud hhr Contribs 19:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Jay-Jay Feeney
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jay-Jay Feeney ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am sorry but I do believe that sources here are just puff pieces. Should be relooked at. Looks like it is written by the subject themselves.
- Update - I am looking through this article. The previous sources are from the subjects twitter and published book. They are not reliable sources. The rest of the sources that are still there are just from news outlets, similar to a tabloid. So where does all the rest of the information come from. It seems to be written by the subject themselves or an agent. But it's not a notable article unless someone can prove me wrong. DominikRuben ( talk) 11:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Easily passes WP:GNG. https://www.google.com/search?q=jay-jay+feeney&sxsrf=ALeKk01xm6z-lRPlTrOTq4PtY-9Y3bWOeg:1622408923474&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjgl8GcqPLwAhXa4jgGHVxyDmgQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1280&bih=633&dpr=1 Nexus000 ( talk) 21:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Very notable figure in NZ radio and media. The article has been reworked since nomination to provide evidence of this. Ajf773 ( talk) 23:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. I think it's poor form to nominate an article for deletion and simultaneously remove 25% of the content. pburka ( talk) 00:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC, based on the sources in and added to the article, and other sources that appear to WP:NEXIST; Feeney is a high profile radio star for over two decades and has authored two books. Beccaynr ( talk) 01:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Also, multiple wins at the New Zealand Radio Awards. Beccaynr ( talk) 20:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Someone that knows how, close this as keep and WP:SNOW. Nominator has since been banned. — NZFC (talk) (cont) 01:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.