The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC) reply
PROD contested by author; original rationale was: There is only one proposal for this designation, and the proposal hasn't risen to the level where it could actually come to pass. This fails WP:GNG as a result because there hasn't been multiple, independent sources documenting it. This appears to be a pipe dream discussed vaguely on the local level without any actual indication in WP:RS that this designation is being actively pursued. Exit list is pretty obviously original research. Kinu t/ c 21:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC) reply
PROD contested by author; original rationale was: There is only one proposal for this designation, and the proposal hasn't risen to the level where it could actually come to pass. This fails WP:GNG as a result because there hasn't been multiple, independent sources documenting it. This appears to be a pipe dream discussed vaguely on the local level without any actual indication in WP:RS that this designation is being actively pursued. Exit list is pretty obviously original research. Kinu t/ c 21:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC) reply