- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Identity Performance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Identity Performance ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010, as well as WP:OR and Essay. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychology and Social science. UtherSRG (talk) 11:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep seems reasonably well-sourced and an idea that does have some support among academics (not OR). The article is a little too essay-like for my liking, so it should be rewritten, but I don't think it rises to the level of deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 15:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The concept is covered by scholarly sources. If it looks like an essay, why not work on improvement instead of deleting it? Darwin Naz ( talk) 23:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. I don't see OR here. In fact, I can't find a good defence of the original WP:N tag, either, considering the breadth depth of RS. Yes, it needs a rewrite, but so do about a quarter the articles on Wikipedia. That is an opportunity for improvement, not deletion. I do not see how deleting this article will improve Wikipedia. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 16:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Identity Performance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Identity Performance ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010, as well as WP:OR and Essay. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychology and Social science. UtherSRG (talk) 11:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep seems reasonably well-sourced and an idea that does have some support among academics (not OR). The article is a little too essay-like for my liking, so it should be rewritten, but I don't think it rises to the level of deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 15:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. The concept is covered by scholarly sources. If it looks like an essay, why not work on improvement instead of deleting it? Darwin Naz ( talk) 23:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. I don't see OR here. In fact, I can't find a good defence of the original WP:N tag, either, considering the breadth depth of RS. Yes, it needs a rewrite, but so do about a quarter the articles on Wikipedia. That is an opportunity for improvement, not deletion. I do not see how deleting this article will improve Wikipedia. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 16:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.