- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to International Symposium on Computer Architecture. further merges can be discussed elsewhere DGG ( talk ) 23:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
ISCA Influential Paper Award
- ISCA Influential Paper Award ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DePRODed by auhtor without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: Non notable award. Fails WP:GNG. Only primary sources appear to exist. Still fails WP:ORG Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a $1000 prize isn't notable; there's no sign this is even the most important award given by SIGARCH. Power~enwiki ( talk) 05:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to International Symposium on Computer Architecture. Not independently notable but there's no reason not to mention it at the parent article, in more detail than the present see-also link. I have left a pointer to this discussion at Talk:International Symposium on Computer Architecture, as I think should be mandatory whenever a merge is proposed within an AfD. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge into International Symposium on Computer Architecture sounds like a good compromise, especially since that article is so sparse. Clearly not independently notable. There do seem a fair number of notable authors of papers with this award. Similar situation for, say, Alan D. Berenbaum Distinguished Service Award, so another option would be to merge 'em all into SIGARCH W Nowicki ( talk) 17:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to International Symposium on Computer Architecture. further merges can be discussed elsewhere DGG ( talk ) 23:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
ISCA Influential Paper Award
- ISCA Influential Paper Award ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DePRODed by auhtor without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: Non notable award. Fails WP:GNG. Only primary sources appear to exist. Still fails WP:ORG Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a $1000 prize isn't notable; there's no sign this is even the most important award given by SIGARCH. Power~enwiki ( talk) 05:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to International Symposium on Computer Architecture. Not independently notable but there's no reason not to mention it at the parent article, in more detail than the present see-also link. I have left a pointer to this discussion at Talk:International Symposium on Computer Architecture, as I think should be mandatory whenever a merge is proposed within an AfD. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge into International Symposium on Computer Architecture sounds like a good compromise, especially since that article is so sparse. Clearly not independently notable. There do seem a fair number of notable authors of papers with this award. Similar situation for, say, Alan D. Berenbaum Distinguished Service Award, so another option would be to merge 'em all into SIGARCH W Nowicki ( talk) 17:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.