From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. It would be wonderful if notability-establishing sources could be added to the article. It would lessen the possibility that this article will be returned to AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hava (musician)

Hava (musician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search results are drowned out by results about Hava Nagila. Does not appear to have significant coverage from secondary sources.

May be notable from chart placements as lead or featured artists. Schrödinger's jellyfish  17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply

English results are drowned out by Hava Nagila (per above), but I've tracked down some more recent sources in German:
I can't speak to their reliability or value to the article, though if anyone speaks German, these may be of use. Schrödinger's jellyfish  17:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete: The sources provided are not enough for the article but the charting is a start. Fails WP:GNG and passes WP:NMUSICIAN.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheChineseGroundnut ( talkcontribs)
  • Keep Our notability guidelines WP:MUSICBIO state we may presume notability with a record in national charts. Hava has 13 entries in the German official chart, including a number 1, which is cited in the article and meets WP:GOODCHARTS: GfK. Another example of further secondary coverage: HAVA - "JA SAGEN". I don't have the language skills for in-depth investigation - however with this sort of charting record I think we can safely presume further secondary sources exist. Note: I've added two more charting singles, including a top 10, to the article. Resonant Distortion 22:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep per ResonantDistortion, appears to pass WP:NMUSICIAN Tehonk ( talk) 17:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep chart-holders are of public interest and there is some coverage. - Altenmann >talk 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep passes criteria 2 of WP:NMUSIC with nationally charting releases as confirmed in reliable sources such as this, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. It would be wonderful if notability-establishing sources could be added to the article. It would lessen the possibility that this article will be returned to AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hava (musician)

Hava (musician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search results are drowned out by results about Hava Nagila. Does not appear to have significant coverage from secondary sources.

May be notable from chart placements as lead or featured artists. Schrödinger's jellyfish  17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply

English results are drowned out by Hava Nagila (per above), but I've tracked down some more recent sources in German:
I can't speak to their reliability or value to the article, though if anyone speaks German, these may be of use. Schrödinger's jellyfish  17:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete: The sources provided are not enough for the article but the charting is a start. Fails WP:GNG and passes WP:NMUSICIAN.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheChineseGroundnut ( talkcontribs)
  • Keep Our notability guidelines WP:MUSICBIO state we may presume notability with a record in national charts. Hava has 13 entries in the German official chart, including a number 1, which is cited in the article and meets WP:GOODCHARTS: GfK. Another example of further secondary coverage: HAVA - "JA SAGEN". I don't have the language skills for in-depth investigation - however with this sort of charting record I think we can safely presume further secondary sources exist. Note: I've added two more charting singles, including a top 10, to the article. Resonant Distortion 22:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep per ResonantDistortion, appears to pass WP:NMUSICIAN Tehonk ( talk) 17:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep chart-holders are of public interest and there is some coverage. - Altenmann >talk 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Keep passes criteria 2 of WP:NMUSIC with nationally charting releases as confirmed in reliable sources such as this, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook