This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 December 31. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was made in good faith but fails to present a rationale for deletion. This article has been discussed heavily and although consensus can change, the nominator does not present a new argument to the discussion. v/r - T P 16:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Offensive to Blacks, this article does nothing to improve the encyclopedia, is a self-reference because the group was founded specifically to troll Wikipedia and other prominent websites, and it brings Foundation officials, editors, and projects into disrepute, risking funding and credibility. All previous reasons to keep this abomination should be disregarded because per WP:IAR it does not improve the encyclopedia in any way, but damages it in the several ways specified. Selery ( talk) 15:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 December 31. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy keep. Nomination was made in good faith but fails to present a rationale for deletion. This article has been discussed heavily and although consensus can change, the nominator does not present a new argument to the discussion. v/r - T P 16:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Offensive to Blacks, this article does nothing to improve the encyclopedia, is a self-reference because the group was founded specifically to troll Wikipedia and other prominent websites, and it brings Foundation officials, editors, and projects into disrepute, risking funding and credibility. All previous reasons to keep this abomination should be disregarded because per WP:IAR it does not improve the encyclopedia in any way, but damages it in the several ways specified. Selery ( talk) 15:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply