[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
If the article focuses solely on the conflicts between the Gauda kingdom and the Guptas, it lacks WP:RS and historians do not consider these mutual campaigns as a single state of war, known as the "GaudaâGupta War(s)". If we include the mutual conflicts between the Guptas and Gaudas in the article's scope, it becomes a result of original research and the synthesis of multiple conflicts. The conflicts involving Ishanavarman, Jivitagupta I, and Gopachandra are mentioned, but figures such as Kumaragupta III, Dharmaditya, and Samacharadeva are not addressed in the War section, but in the infobox. Upon reviewing the sources, authors are uncertain about the statements, with a weak consensus. In essence, the article combines non-notable military conflicts, cited by low-quality sources, involving different kingdomsâthe Maukhari dynasty and the Later Gupta dynastyâagainst the Gauda kingdom, and labels it as the "GaudaâGupta War". It adds minor conflicts to create the impression of significance, which is not justified. The article fails to meet GNG and contains original research. There are significant issues to address, AFD is limiting the discourse. Imperial [AFCND] 13:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It's quite likely that the war of Ishanavarman against the Gaudas whom he had forced to take shelter on the sea shore and the victory of Jivitagupta I over the enemies who stood on the sea-shore, refer to the expeditions launched by the Maukharis and the Later Guptas, separately or jointly, against the kings of Bengal discussed above who had declared their independence of the empire and had assumed the imperial title. Probably, the Maukhari and the Later Gupta rulers undertook these campaigns in the name of the Gupta emperor who was their nominal overlord, though their success increased their own power, and not of the emperor.From Goyal (1967).
The people of Gauda (W. Bengal) also achieved prominence, and a Maukhari chief claims to have defeated them. The Later Guptas also fought against some enemies who lived on the sea-shore. The reference in both cases may be to the kings of Bengal mentioned above, and the military campaigns of the Maukharis and the Later Guptas might have been undertaken, jointly or severally, on behalf of the Gupta emperor, their nominal overlord.Majumdar (1970).
cited with low quality sourcesis referring my earlier statement in the proposal
authors are uncertain about the statements, with a weak consensus, take the time to read the whole proposal reason. The weakness of the statements from the sources are evident from the above quotes, presented by yourself above.
It's quite likely that...Probably, the Maukhari and the Later Gupta rulers un...from Goyal and
The reference in both cases may be to the kings of Bengal mentioned above...and the Later Guptas might have been undertaken, jointly orfrom Majumdar. Keeping this weak statements aside, surprisingly I couldn't find any latest records about the event(s).-- Imperial [AFCND] 17:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
AFD is limiting the discourse, I need a bigger space to expose the whole mess within the article. And no need to drag SasanianâKushan Wars here. Take that to the respective talk section if you have any problem with it. Imperial [AFCND] 17:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
OwenĂ
â 20:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
If the article focuses solely on the conflicts between the Gauda kingdom and the Guptas, it lacks WP:RS and historians do not consider these mutual campaigns as a single state of war, known as the "GaudaâGupta War(s)". If we include the mutual conflicts between the Guptas and Gaudas in the article's scope, it becomes a result of original research and the synthesis of multiple conflicts. The conflicts involving Ishanavarman, Jivitagupta I, and Gopachandra are mentioned, but figures such as Kumaragupta III, Dharmaditya, and Samacharadeva are not addressed in the War section, but in the infobox. Upon reviewing the sources, authors are uncertain about the statements, with a weak consensus. In essence, the article combines non-notable military conflicts, cited by low-quality sources, involving different kingdomsâthe Maukhari dynasty and the Later Gupta dynastyâagainst the Gauda kingdom, and labels it as the "GaudaâGupta War". It adds minor conflicts to create the impression of significance, which is not justified. The article fails to meet GNG and contains original research. There are significant issues to address, AFD is limiting the discourse. Imperial [AFCND] 13:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It's quite likely that the war of Ishanavarman against the Gaudas whom he had forced to take shelter on the sea shore and the victory of Jivitagupta I over the enemies who stood on the sea-shore, refer to the expeditions launched by the Maukharis and the Later Guptas, separately or jointly, against the kings of Bengal discussed above who had declared their independence of the empire and had assumed the imperial title. Probably, the Maukhari and the Later Gupta rulers undertook these campaigns in the name of the Gupta emperor who was their nominal overlord, though their success increased their own power, and not of the emperor.From Goyal (1967).
The people of Gauda (W. Bengal) also achieved prominence, and a Maukhari chief claims to have defeated them. The Later Guptas also fought against some enemies who lived on the sea-shore. The reference in both cases may be to the kings of Bengal mentioned above, and the military campaigns of the Maukharis and the Later Guptas might have been undertaken, jointly or severally, on behalf of the Gupta emperor, their nominal overlord.Majumdar (1970).
cited with low quality sourcesis referring my earlier statement in the proposal
authors are uncertain about the statements, with a weak consensus, take the time to read the whole proposal reason. The weakness of the statements from the sources are evident from the above quotes, presented by yourself above.
It's quite likely that...Probably, the Maukhari and the Later Gupta rulers un...from Goyal and
The reference in both cases may be to the kings of Bengal mentioned above...and the Later Guptas might have been undertaken, jointly orfrom Majumdar. Keeping this weak statements aside, surprisingly I couldn't find any latest records about the event(s).-- Imperial [AFCND] 17:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
AFD is limiting the discourse, I need a bigger space to expose the whole mess within the article. And no need to drag SasanianâKushan Wars here. Take that to the respective talk section if you have any problem with it. Imperial [AFCND] 17:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
OwenĂ
â 20:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)