The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:AUTOBIO isn't forbidden, but when your autobiography doesn't even make you seem any notable, chances are you aren't notable.
Timmyshin (
talk) 23:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete This looks like a good faith creation by someone who probably doesn't know too much about Wikipedia. That said, the subject doesn't seem to be satisfy GNG or
WP:AUTHOR, so I will go with a delete. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk) 13:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as trivial and unconvincing with the clear signs of no existing substance.
SwisterTwistertalk 18:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unless sources exist in another language, does not seem to satisfy
WP:GNG.
No longer a penguin (
talk) 08:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:AUTOBIO isn't forbidden, but when your autobiography doesn't even make you seem any notable, chances are you aren't notable.
Timmyshin (
talk) 23:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete This looks like a good faith creation by someone who probably doesn't know too much about Wikipedia. That said, the subject doesn't seem to be satisfy GNG or
WP:AUTHOR, so I will go with a delete. --
Lemongirl942 (
talk) 13:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as trivial and unconvincing with the clear signs of no existing substance.
SwisterTwistertalk 18:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unless sources exist in another language, does not seem to satisfy
WP:GNG.
No longer a penguin (
talk) 08:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.