- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 12:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Esper (fiction)
- Esper (fiction) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · (fiction) Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - it's a trivia article full of original research and fancruft. Many works listed don't use the term "Esper" and have little in common with Alfred Bester's idea. There's no info about espers (how could there be, when no-one has defined it?), just lists of dubious examples. The articles on Telepathy, Psychic and Extrasensory perception etc give more than enough fictional examples of these sorts of characters.-- twl_corinthian ( talk) 18:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:FANCRUFT, can't find any secondary coverage. Soft redirect unnecessary since esper already exists. — Nizolan (talk) 23:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggests solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a thing, and people do use the term ( [1], [2]), but I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 05:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 12:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Esper (fiction)
- Esper (fiction) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · (fiction) Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - it's a trivia article full of original research and fancruft. Many works listed don't use the term "Esper" and have little in common with Alfred Bester's idea. There's no info about espers (how could there be, when no-one has defined it?), just lists of dubious examples. The articles on Telepathy, Psychic and Extrasensory perception etc give more than enough fictional examples of these sorts of characters.-- twl_corinthian ( talk) 18:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:FANCRUFT, can't find any secondary coverage. Soft redirect unnecessary since esper already exists. — Nizolan (talk) 23:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggests solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a thing, and people do use the term ( [1], [2]), but I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 05:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.