- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 15:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Epiphany Parish of Seattle
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Epiphany Parish of Seattle ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't make this pass WP:NORG. The given references are either self-published or ancillary coverage (about the neighborhood where the parish is, for example). Mikeblas ( talk) 00:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- (with regret) delete -- This is a relatively full article, probably because the church produced a centenary history, but it seem to be a run pf the mill local church. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this is a run of the mill local congregation, nothing to justify an article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Agree with the above. Kolma8 ( talk) 10:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete — Per rationale provide by nom, JPL & K8. I wasn’t able to observe significant coverage following a google and google book search. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain ( talk) 15:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Epiphany Parish of Seattle
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Epiphany Parish of Seattle ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't make this pass WP:NORG. The given references are either self-published or ancillary coverage (about the neighborhood where the parish is, for example). Mikeblas ( talk) 00:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- (with regret) delete -- This is a relatively full article, probably because the church produced a centenary history, but it seem to be a run pf the mill local church. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this is a run of the mill local congregation, nothing to justify an article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Agree with the above. Kolma8 ( talk) 10:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete — Per rationale provide by nom, JPL & K8. I wasn’t able to observe significant coverage following a google and google book search. Celestina007 ( talk) 11:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.