The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me.
GiantSnowman 14:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per sources added to article which show he is notable in Oceania. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk) 17:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep given that the driving force behind this purge is a change in notability policy, articles should be tagged and given reasonable time for improvement rather than simply deleted. --
IdiotSavant (
talk) 06:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, I'm not seeing evidence of the sourcing necessary to pass
WP:GNG. The OFC article, which might not be a secondary source, is the only thing I could find that provides SIGCOV, all other sources in the article or which I could find from a search were either database listings or only provided passing mentions.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 00:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me.
GiantSnowman 14:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per sources added to article which show he is notable in Oceania. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk) 17:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep given that the driving force behind this purge is a change in notability policy, articles should be tagged and given reasonable time for improvement rather than simply deleted. --
IdiotSavant (
talk) 06:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, I'm not seeing evidence of the sourcing necessary to pass
WP:GNG. The OFC article, which might not be a secondary source, is the only thing I could find that provides SIGCOV, all other sources in the article or which I could find from a search were either database listings or only provided passing mentions.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 00:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.