The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties. This article fails GNG and ORG and whilst there are citations, they only prove existence rather than achievement. There is no notability prior to, or following, elections and no notable election result. Usefulness is not a valid reason to retain an article.
doktorbwordsdeeds 22:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. In the previous AfD debate, the rationale for keeping the page was that the party was extant. As this is no longer the case, and per the nominator's comments, there seems no reason to keep the page.
It's a near-orphan and it doesn't appear to be connected with anyone significant, so there's no obvious target for a redirect.
~dom Kaos~ (
talk) 09:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties. This article fails GNG and ORG and whilst there are citations, they only prove existence rather than achievement. There is no notability prior to, or following, elections and no notable election result. Usefulness is not a valid reason to retain an article.
doktorbwordsdeeds 22:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. In the previous AfD debate, the rationale for keeping the page was that the party was extant. As this is no longer the case, and per the nominator's comments, there seems no reason to keep the page.
It's a near-orphan and it doesn't appear to be connected with anyone significant, so there's no obvious target for a redirect.
~dom Kaos~ (
talk) 09:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.