- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 04:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Beyond Treason
- Beyond Treason ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. Claimed award was for the Berkeley Film Fest, but it was essentially an unscreened honorable mention. Looks like an attempt to promote the subject of a non-notable film through a Wikipedia article, mostly. jps ( talk) 20:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable per nominator. WegianWarrior ( talk) 20:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails to meet the criteria outlined in Wikipedia:Notability (films). WP:SOAPBOX is a concern: This and other articles associated with it (e.g. William Lewis (film director), Joyce Riley --> American Gulf War Veterans Association, Doug Rokke --> Anti-depleted uranium weapons activism, Dave vonKleist, and 911: In Plane Site) form a walled garden of articles that are either poorly or dubiously sourced. Location ( talk) 20:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as not-notable, can find nothing other than mentions on bug-eyed conspiracy theorist websites & the like. The claimed award is not particularly impressive. TheLongTone ( talk) 20:44, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of any notability. – Davey2010 • (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 13:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Director:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Writer:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete While this film exists and might stir up anxieties, it has not received coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NF, no significant coverage. - - MrBill3 ( talk) 05:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable MarlovianPlough ( talk) 03:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete; when controversial topics are short on notability, it becomes impossible for us to sustain a
neutral article.
bobrayner (
talk) 12:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Kindly elucidate this assertion of controversial articles becoming NPOV due to lack of notability. Anarchangel ( talk) 01:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 04:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Beyond Treason
- Beyond Treason ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. Claimed award was for the Berkeley Film Fest, but it was essentially an unscreened honorable mention. Looks like an attempt to promote the subject of a non-notable film through a Wikipedia article, mostly. jps ( talk) 20:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable per nominator. WegianWarrior ( talk) 20:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails to meet the criteria outlined in Wikipedia:Notability (films). WP:SOAPBOX is a concern: This and other articles associated with it (e.g. William Lewis (film director), Joyce Riley --> American Gulf War Veterans Association, Doug Rokke --> Anti-depleted uranium weapons activism, Dave vonKleist, and 911: In Plane Site) form a walled garden of articles that are either poorly or dubiously sourced. Location ( talk) 20:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as not-notable, can find nothing other than mentions on bug-eyed conspiracy theorist websites & the like. The claimed award is not particularly impressive. TheLongTone ( talk) 20:44, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as no evidence of any notability. – Davey2010 • (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 13:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Director:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Writer:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Alt:(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete While this film exists and might stir up anxieties, it has not received coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NF, no significant coverage. - - MrBill3 ( talk) 05:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable MarlovianPlough ( talk) 03:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete; when controversial topics are short on notability, it becomes impossible for us to sustain a
neutral article.
bobrayner (
talk) 12:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Kindly elucidate this assertion of controversial articles becoming NPOV due to lack of notability. Anarchangel ( talk) 01:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.