The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Meets
WP:DIRECTOR obviously. Keep. His films received coverage in Variety, in The NYT, etc, etc. "Non-notable", how???-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
When I looked at this I was unsure. I found two in variety references:
[2] This one is an annoucement with a description of the production details. Its the usual film release notice.
It doesn't inspire confidence but he could be massive and I've just missed it and his film possibly. Post three reference and I'll withdraw. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 13:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
His filmS. At least 3 are VERY notable films. Three references about them? That's a bizarre requirement. But OK. Allow me to post 4.
ONE;
TWO;
THREEFOUR. PLENTY of coverage exists. The Reception sections of the articleS about his first 2 3 features should, in my view, have been considered. Even the article about him shows enough to demonstrate notability. But all is well...-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: there's a non-trivial amount of coverage about his films, including Variety
[3], I think he's notable.
Oaktree b (
talk) 16:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment So it looks like Benjamin Ree (love that name) is notable. Nomination Withdrawnscope_creepTalk 17:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Meets
WP:DIRECTOR obviously. Keep. His films received coverage in Variety, in The NYT, etc, etc. "Non-notable", how???-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
When I looked at this I was unsure. I found two in variety references:
[2] This one is an annoucement with a description of the production details. Its the usual film release notice.
It doesn't inspire confidence but he could be massive and I've just missed it and his film possibly. Post three reference and I'll withdraw. Hope that helps. scope_creepTalk 13:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
His filmS. At least 3 are VERY notable films. Three references about them? That's a bizarre requirement. But OK. Allow me to post 4.
ONE;
TWO;
THREEFOUR. PLENTY of coverage exists. The Reception sections of the articleS about his first 2 3 features should, in my view, have been considered. Even the article about him shows enough to demonstrate notability. But all is well...-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: there's a non-trivial amount of coverage about his films, including Variety
[3], I think he's notable.
Oaktree b (
talk) 16:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment So it looks like Benjamin Ree (love that name) is notable. Nomination Withdrawnscope_creepTalk 17:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.