From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Beast poetry

Beast poetry (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced barring quotes. No indication of importance. Drowssap SMM 02:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Poetry, and Europe. Drowssap SMM 02:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep in one form or another. It may be the case that Ziolkowski is in fact the first/primary/only scholar to use the term "beast poetry" specifically. However, he seems to be influential in the field. Talking Animals: Medieval Latin Beast Poetry, 750-1150 has 180+ citation in Google Scholar and numerous reviews ( [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]). One option could be to re-frame the article to be about the book. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics cites Ziolkowski in the entry on Beast epic, so if nothing else we could merge there. But I'm inclined to keep given that it seems to be an accepted scholarly genre. Jfire ( talk) 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or draftify, convinced by Jfire. Hyperbolick ( talk) 08:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment a search under “bestiary poetry” or “poetic bestiary” suggests the topic is notable, and one of these terms might serve as an alternative title. Mccapra ( talk) 18:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep The topic is fo-shizzle notable. It's a matter of reframing the article and creating possible alternate titles. I don't think draftify is warranted here. It can be fixed being on the main space. X ( talk) 12:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Beast poetry

Beast poetry (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced barring quotes. No indication of importance. Drowssap SMM 02:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Poetry, and Europe. Drowssap SMM 02:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep in one form or another. It may be the case that Ziolkowski is in fact the first/primary/only scholar to use the term "beast poetry" specifically. However, he seems to be influential in the field. Talking Animals: Medieval Latin Beast Poetry, 750-1150 has 180+ citation in Google Scholar and numerous reviews ( [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]). One option could be to re-frame the article to be about the book. The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics cites Ziolkowski in the entry on Beast epic, so if nothing else we could merge there. But I'm inclined to keep given that it seems to be an accepted scholarly genre. Jfire ( talk) 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or draftify, convinced by Jfire. Hyperbolick ( talk) 08:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment a search under “bestiary poetry” or “poetic bestiary” suggests the topic is notable, and one of these terms might serve as an alternative title. Mccapra ( talk) 18:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep The topic is fo-shizzle notable. It's a matter of reframing the article and creating possible alternate titles. I don't think draftify is warranted here. It can be fixed being on the main space. X ( talk) 12:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook