This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2012 January 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy keep. Speedy keep. We've covered this ground. Nominator's account possibly compromised. Drmies ( talk) 03:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The references provided for this article do not satisfy the requirements for notability. Many of these references are by-lines. These are not secondary sources. Further, they are not about the subject, they only contain contributions by the subject, and do not establish notability. Several of them do not meet the reliability test because they are not accessible. No listed source "addresses the subject directly in detail", which is the first requirement for notability in WP:NOTABILITY.
I think it is important to note that while this article has survived several nominations, its subject (and frequent editor) is an administrator here, and as such, should be held to a very high standard. He is free to share this information on his user page, and on Linked-In, but this does not belong in the main wiki. Fortheloveofbacon ( talk) 01:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2012 January 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy keep. Speedy keep. We've covered this ground. Nominator's account possibly compromised. Drmies ( talk) 03:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The references provided for this article do not satisfy the requirements for notability. Many of these references are by-lines. These are not secondary sources. Further, they are not about the subject, they only contain contributions by the subject, and do not establish notability. Several of them do not meet the reliability test because they are not accessible. No listed source "addresses the subject directly in detail", which is the first requirement for notability in WP:NOTABILITY.
I think it is important to note that while this article has survived several nominations, its subject (and frequent editor) is an administrator here, and as such, should be held to a very high standard. He is free to share this information on his user page, and on Linked-In, but this does not belong in the main wiki. Fortheloveofbacon ( talk) 01:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply