The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
book that doesn't appear notable -- definitely created during a different era -- prior deletion discussion didn't ground it in
WP:NBOOKSadads (
talk) 21:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I have cited a couple of reviews in the article. More are available
here.
Phil Bridger (
talk) 09:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passes criteria one of
WP:BKCRIT with multiple published reviews in academic journals within the textbook's field. Notability is not temporary, so arguments that the text is now outdated are irrelevant.
4meter4 (
talk) 12:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 00:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
book that doesn't appear notable -- definitely created during a different era -- prior deletion discussion didn't ground it in
WP:NBOOKSadads (
talk) 21:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I have cited a couple of reviews in the article. More are available
here.
Phil Bridger (
talk) 09:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passes criteria one of
WP:BKCRIT with multiple published reviews in academic journals within the textbook's field. Notability is not temporary, so arguments that the text is now outdated are irrelevant.
4meter4 (
talk) 12:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 00:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.