The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable corporate professional. Being listed in Forbes listed is not an indication of notability since Forbes publishes many such lists. Fails
WP:GNG.
Nomadicghumakkad (
talk) 09:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:BASIC and
WP:GNG, including because I found and added two in-depth profiles of her to the article:
The Indian Express (2014),
Femina (2016), and multiple independent and reliable sources find the Forbes recognition, and the reasons for the recognition, notable, e.g.
HuffPost "Forbes said in less than a decade Srinivasan has catapulted Shriram Life Insurance into one of the top five private players in its industry in India in terms of profitability,"
The Hindu (includes a brief overview of her education and career development),
The Economic Times/PTI,
ZEENews/IANS.
Beccaynr (
talk) 23:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC) I also found and added a 2010
Business Today profile.
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC) There is also an in-depth profile in this book, and information from it has been added to the article: Amarnath, Nischinta; Ghosh, Debashish (2005).
The Voyage to Excellence The Ascent of 21 Women Leaders of India Inc. Delhi: Pustak Mahal.
ISBN9788122309041.
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for bringing these sources
Beccaynr. Definitely keep.
VV, can you teach me how to speedy keep without admin closure on this like you did for that vice chancelor article?
Nomadicghumakkad (
talk) 04:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep passes
WP:GNG. Thanks
Beccaynr for the sources.
VV 03:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable corporate professional. Being listed in Forbes listed is not an indication of notability since Forbes publishes many such lists. Fails
WP:GNG.
Nomadicghumakkad (
talk) 09:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:BASIC and
WP:GNG, including because I found and added two in-depth profiles of her to the article:
The Indian Express (2014),
Femina (2016), and multiple independent and reliable sources find the Forbes recognition, and the reasons for the recognition, notable, e.g.
HuffPost "Forbes said in less than a decade Srinivasan has catapulted Shriram Life Insurance into one of the top five private players in its industry in India in terms of profitability,"
The Hindu (includes a brief overview of her education and career development),
The Economic Times/PTI,
ZEENews/IANS.
Beccaynr (
talk) 23:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC) I also found and added a 2010
Business Today profile.
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC) There is also an in-depth profile in this book, and information from it has been added to the article: Amarnath, Nischinta; Ghosh, Debashish (2005).
The Voyage to Excellence The Ascent of 21 Women Leaders of India Inc. Delhi: Pustak Mahal.
ISBN9788122309041.
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for bringing these sources
Beccaynr. Definitely keep.
VV, can you teach me how to speedy keep without admin closure on this like you did for that vice chancelor article?
Nomadicghumakkad (
talk) 04:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep passes
WP:GNG. Thanks
Beccaynr for the sources.
VV 03:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.