![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
| ||
( ← Prev) | 2007 archives | ( Next →) |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST/A |
|
Just two weeks ago marked the end of 2006, and the end of the biggest year Wikipedia has seen, in terms of growth, press coverage, and quality. During last year, the English Wikipedia grew from less than 900,000 [1] to over 1,500,000 [2] articles. It began with elections for the Arbitration Committee and stewardship, and ended with elections for the Arbitration Committee and stewardship. This week, the Wikipedia Signpost continues our look back at the year that was 2006 in Wikipedia.
Due to a scheduling quirk, 2006 saw two annual Arbitration Committee elections. The January elections saw 11 arbitrators elected in all (originally, 8 seats were up for reelection, but to avoid high turnover on the Committee, and with a high rate of community support, Jimbo Wales chose to add three extra seats). In all, 68 candidates applied for the elections; of these, 14 withdrew during the vote.
All but one incumbent arbitrator regained a seat on the Committee ( Kelly Martin withdrew from consideration early in the vote and resigned from the committee shortly thereafter, citing personal reasons.) [3]
In December, a second election was held. In this election, the five three-year seats in Tranche Gamma were available; with the resignation of Mindspillage, who took a seat on the Foundation Board of Trustees, and the absence of Filiocht, who had not participated in arbitration due to illness, two additional two-year seats were made available. Jimbo indicated that Mindspillage and Filiocht were free to claim extra seats should they come back before their terms were due to expire in December 2008. [4] 37 candidates ran for the seats, of which 6 withdrew during the elections. The results were as follows:
Of the previous Tranche Gamma, one seat was vacant due to the resignation of Mackensen in February. [5] None of the four remaining incumbent arbitrators chose to run again. This was the first time in the Arbitration Committee's history that no incumbents attempted to defend their seats.
Oddly enough, two annual elections were also held for the global position of steward. Stewards' main jobs are to help out with the jobs of bureaucrats and CheckUsers on smaller wikis, where bureaucrats are unlikely to be active or existent, and CheckUser policies have not yet been agreed upon (only 27 individual projects, along with Wikimedia Commons and the Meta-Wiki, currently have CheckUsers). [6] While the Board of Trustees makes a final ruling on the suitability of a candidate, and can pick any candidates with at least 80% support and at least 30 support votes to become stewards, their decision in both 2006 elections was to promote all candidates who had received 80% or more.
In January 2006's elections, nine candidates were chosen: Ascánder, Ausir, Jean-Christophe Chazalette, Jon Harald Søby, Paginazero, Rdsmith4, Romihaitza, Suisui, and Walter. [7] Of the nine, two (Jean-Christophe Chazalette and Ascánder) have since resigned.
In December 2006's elections, eleven candidates were chosen: Bastique, Cspurrier, Darkoneko, Dbl2010, Drini, Effeietsanders, Guillom, M7, MaxSem, Pathoschild, Redux, and Shanel. [8]
In 2006, two new user classifications became widely used: CheckUser and Oversight. CheckUser, which was actually introduced as a formal classification in 2005, is the ability to view and compare the IP addresses of contributors when it is presumed that these users might be involved in sockpuppeting or disruption. The requests for CheckUser page, created in January 2006, has become a key site to visit by users who suspect that sockpuppeting might be occurring. [9] Oversight, meanwhile, is the ability to hide page revisions containing libel, personal informations and in extreme cases, copyright violations; it was introduced in June after the insertion of inappropriate content, particularly on busy pages like the administrators' noticeboard, where deletions caused undue stress on the servers, due to the number of revisions involved. [10] There were 17 users with oversight privileges when it was introduced; there are currently 28 users with these privileges.
A source of controversy in early 2006 was a series of disputes over userboxes. Introduced to the English Wikipedia in late March, 2005, as a way of communicating to other users the languages that a user speaks, userboxes soon became a way to express one's likes and dislikes, talents, and even edit counts. Controversy erupted in late December 2005 when Kelly Martin began deleting userboxes that she deemed controversial or offensive, and those that contained fair use images; two requests for comment were filed in the case. [11]
More controversy occurred when a pro-pedophilia userbox ignited a wheel war. Jimbo Wales temporarily de-sysopped five of the administrators who had been most involved in escalating the situation. [12] An arbitration case was hastily brought in the matter, and just five days after the case was opened, it was closed with the following remedies:
The case was the fastest arbitration case to close with remedies enacted. Although an
April arbitration case involving userboxes was filed, and resulted in the desysopping of Guanaco, most of the controversy over userboxes has since faded, as most have been moved from the template namespace into user subpages. Divisive or inflammatory userboxes are rarely seen anymore, and can be speedy deleted under
criterion T1.
Through 2005, only five users had been permanently desysopped. 11 users were permanently desysopped in 2006; other than Karmafist and Carnildo, the others are:
2006 was the biggest year Wikipedia has seen in terms of overall progress and growth. It's likely that 2007 will be even bigger, busier and more bustling. Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and thanks for reading the Signpost.
In December,
Jimbo Wales
announced the election of seven users to the
Arbitration Committee:
Blnguyen,
Flcelloguy,
FloNight,
Jpgordon,
Kirill Lokshin,
Paul August, and
UninvitedCompany. This week, the Signpost interviews the newly elected arbitrators, after just over two weeks on the job, to see how arbitration is coming along:
1. How do you feel about getting the opportunity to serve on the ArbCom?
2. What do you think of the election? Do you think they were conducted properly? What could have been improved, in your opinion?
3. What would you say to those who supported you? Opposed you?
4. What do you think of the other Wikipedians who were appointed along with you?
5. After about two weeks on the job, what are your initial thoughts?
6. How active a role do you plan to take on ArbCom workshop pages, and in writing ArbCom decisions, a role that has historically been handled mostly by just a few individuals?
7. What do you think are the strengths of the ArbCom? Weaknesses?
8. If you could change anything, what would you change? Why?
9. Do you plan on finishing your term? If you had to make a choice right now, when your term expires, would you run for re-election? Why or why not?
10. If there's one thing you could say to the Wikipedia community, what would you say, and why? Is there anything else you would like to mention?
A new software feature to guard against sophisticated "indirect" vandalism of the Main Page has been implemented. Dubbed "cascading protection", it automatically applies to local images and templates, which have been frequent targets for this type of vandalism.
As a very high-traffic page, the Main Page has long been an attractive target for vandals. Because it includes a constantly changing variety of elements, vulnerabilities have occasionally appeared when nobody thinks to protect a new element, or even an element of an element. The feature, which "cascades" the regular protection feature down to such elements, was developed primarily by Andrew Garrett ( User:Werdna). Chief Technical Officer Brion Vibber enabled it in the MediaWiki software and applied cascading protection to the Main Page at 09:55 (UTC) on 14 January.
Cascading protection operates as follows: If a page is protected using the feature, any pages included in it will also be protected for as long as they remain included in it. This protection should take effect instantly and automatically even if templates are included dynamically by a mechanism such as that used by the Main Page. Administrators can enable cascading protection by means of a checkbox on the usual protection form.
Vibber pointed out that cascading protection does not apply to images hosted on the Wikimedia Commons. This means that the image will need to be protected manually by an administrator on the Commons project. In the first few months of that project, complaints were voiced about its responsiveness to such requests, but now the matter is handled fairly routinely.
The feature was developed while a separate effort was underway to run a bot that would achieve similar results. ProtectionBot, a bot run by Dragons flight, was the subject of a much-debated request for adminship, in order to obtain the administrator-only function of protecting and unprotecting pages. This followed a request for approval of bot status, which was generally supported, but it was suggested that the issue of a bot with administrator abilities needed to be brought before a wider audience.
Once the cascading protection feature had been added to MediaWiki, Dragons flight withdrew the request on 11 January. Although he said the bot "has certain functionality that exceeds that provided by Werdna's patch, I feel the technical situation has changed too greatly for this RFA to continue to be valid." Dragons flight expressed appreciation to Garrett and the other developers who helped address the problem, while also expressing frustration with the process. Reflecting on the energy devoted to getting the bot approved, he commented, "A good idea, that can be shown to work, should not require this much effort."
At the time the request was withdrawn, there was actually a decent possibility that it would have succeeded. Counts of supporting and opposing comments at the time of withdrawal showed 185 in favor and 41 opposing, with 13 neutral or abstaining comments. Weighing supporters against opponents would put 82% in favor, slightly above the 80% threshold that has commonly been treated by bureaucrats as justifying administrator status without controversy.
A substantial portion of the opposition expressed concern that the source code for the bot was not public. Dragons flight did share the code with a number of other Wikipedians, but declined to release it generally, stating that it could easily be modified to create a vandalbot. Others remained uncertain about giving a bot abilities normally reserved for administrators.
Garrett, who came up with the solution, was actually one of those opposing the request for adminship. In his opinion, "this kind of thing needs to be implemented as part of MediaWiki", along with some of the other functions filled by bots. Others pointed out that the small number of developers makes it difficult to hope that such features would be implemented unless something forces the issue.
WikiWorld is a weekly comic, carried by the Signpost, that highlights a few of the fascinating but little-known articles in the vast Wikipedia archives. The text for each comic is excerpted from one or more existing Wikipedia articles. WikiWorld offers visual interpretations on a wide range of topics: offbeat cultural references and personality profiles, obscure moments in history and unlikely slices of everyday life - as well as "mainstream" subjects with humorous potential.
Cartoonist Greg Williams developed the WikiWorld project in cooperation with the Wikimedia Foundation, and is releasing the comics under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere. Williams works as a visual journalist for the US-based The Tampa Tribune, a daily newspaper in Tampa, Florida. He also has worked as an illustrator and designer at newspapers in Dubuque, Iowa, and Dayton, Ohio.
The Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser will conclude this week. At the end of the drive, over US$1,000,000 had been raised, not including a matching funds donation yet to be received.
After complaints over its effectiveness, and worries that it was being used inappropriately in disputes, the personal attack intervention noticeboard was shut down last week, after a deletion request.
The mailing lists for Wikipedia and other projects have changed to new addresses after the Wikimedia Foundation migrated them to a new server. All new addresses will use @lists.wikipedia.org, so that for example the English Wikipedia mailing list is now wikien-l at lists.wikipedia.org. Old addresses will still work, but the transition will include mail headers and may require recipients to adjust any filters or other settings they use to read list messages. Also note that links to old mailing list messages may point to different ones now: this is because of how the archive rebuilding process works.
A blogger for the Sydney Morning Herald, in an article critical about Wikipedia, vandalized the article Newspaper, touting its own blog as the "world's best column" [1]. The edit was reverted nearly nine hours later by Barnabypage. The page also mentions a vandalous edit to Aspirin, which was not reverted for 28 minutes [2].
Mallen Baker of Ethical Corporation Magazine, a British publication, looked at Wikipedia's article on corporate social responsibility. The author notes that POV battles have made the article "a battleground of ideologues".
CNET reporter Daniel Terdiman profiled an AFD on an article about Terdiman. Terdiman notes that compared to other CNET reporters, he might not have been notable, though the article was kept. Terdiman did, however, incorrectly refer to the AFD as an "administrators' delete-or-not thread".
Five users were granted admin status via the Requests for Adminship process this week: Kinu ( nom), Feydey ( nom), Visviva ( nom), Jersyko ( nom), and BigDT ( nom).
Twenty-two articles were promoted to featured status last week, following the previous week's zero: Avatar: The Last Airbender, Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers), Oriel College, Scottish Parliament Building, Paulins Kill, Hurricane Juan, Christopher C. Kraft, Jr., Hippocrates, Germany, Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector, Sasha (DJ), B movie, South Australian legislative election, 2006, Pilot (House), Turkey, Battle of Edson's Ridge, DNA, Diplodocus, Proteasome, Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Delaware, Immune system, and Regulamentul Organic. DNA was repromoted to FA status after losing it nearly three years ago.
Two articles were de-featured last week: Names of God in Judaism, and Sydney Riot of 1879.
Five lists were promoted to featured status last week: Chicago Bears seasons, Harry Potter films cast members, New Brunswick general elections (post-Confederation), Basil cultivars, and Nintendo 64 games.
Two portals were promoted to featured status last week: Architecture and Vancouver.
The following featured articles were displayed last week on the Main Page as Today's featured article: Invasion, Fauna of Puerto Rico, Half-Life 2, Richard III, Alcibiades, Shoshone National Forest, and Kitsune.
The following featured pictures were displayed last week on the Main Page as picture of the day: Treasury of Athens, Riffle shuffle, Dragonfly, Root canal, Phenotypes, Victoria Crater, and Pennant coralfish.
Thirteen pictures were promoted to featured status last week:
The ImageMap extension by Tim Starling has been enabled on Wikimedia sites. It is now possible for images to be easily used to link to pages, including with different areas linking to different pages. Users should remember to keep in mind the needs of browsers not capable of handling graphics well, such as screen readers and perhaps some handheld devices.
In response to the rise of indirect vandalism on the Main Page (see this Signpost article for further details), a new protection mode was added: cascading protection. If a page is protected this way, any pages included in it will also be protected for as long as they remain included in it. This protection should take effect instantly and automatically even if templates are included dynamically by a mechanism such as that used by the Main Page. Administrators can enable cascading protection by means of a checkbox on the usual protection form. ( Andrew Garrett, various revisions from r18958 to r19103)
The {{PLURAL}}
magic word now treats -1 as singular. (
Leon Weber,
r19031)
Tooltips and
accesskey shortcuts no longer require
JavaScript to use. Consequently, the way in which sysops should edit tooltips and accesskeys has changed. While it is possible to continue using the ta
array in
MediaWiki:monobook.js or
MediaWiki:common.js, it is preferable to delete that and migrate any changes to the new individual messages such as
MediaWiki:Tooltip-userpage. (
Simetrical, bugs
5051 and
5376,
r19036)
A minimum protection level for all pages in a given namespace can now be set in the site configuration. By default, the only namespace thus protected is the MediaWiki namespace, which, as before, is only editable by sysops. ( Ilmari Karonen, r19110)
A bug that prevented non-sysops from viewing the source of system messages left at their default values, such as (at the time of this writing) MediaWiki:About on the English Wikipedia, was fixed. The bug was presumably a side effect of the recent removal of such default messages from the database. ( Ilmari Karonen, r19111)
The contents of <math>
tags, when rendered as plain HTML text rather than as an image, will now always be rendered left-to-right, even on right-to-left wikis. (
Simetrical,
bug 8002,
r19143)
The page-specific CSS class now works consistently in Monobook and non-Monobook skins. ( Mormegil, bug 8643, r19299)
JavaScript authors should be aware that recently, a minor change to the document structure was made for consistency, related specifically to handheld rendering: a div with class of pBody
was wrapped around the unordered list in p-cactions
, to bring it in line with the other lists there. This will cause issues for some inflexibly-written JavaScript that depends on the precise document structure. JavaScript authors are advised to write their scripts so that they will continue to function even if wrappers are added or node order changes. For instance, the <ul>
element containing the content actions can be obtained with document.getElementById("p-cactions").getElementsByTagName("ul")[0];
, which will almost certainly work despite any structural change. (
Simetrical,
r18949)
Also, a new utility function was added for the benefit of JavaScript authors. addPortletLink()
will conveniently add a link to any of the "portlets" in Monobook, including the content actions, personal tools, navigation sidebar, and toolbox. The syntax of the function can be found in
wikibits.js. (
Ilmari Karonen,
r19185)
A number of interface changes were made:
&diffonly=0
or &diffonly=1
to the end of a diff URL will display or hide the revision text regardless of user preferences, respectively. (
Ilmari Karonen,
bug 3446,
r19141)Some updates were made to non-English messages, specifically:
Internationalization help is always appreciated! See m:Localization statistics for how complete the translations of languages you know are, and post any updates to Mediazilla.
The Arbitration Committee opened no cases this week, and closed one case.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
| ||
( ← Prev) | 2007 archives | ( Next →) |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST/A |
|
Just two weeks ago marked the end of 2006, and the end of the biggest year Wikipedia has seen, in terms of growth, press coverage, and quality. During last year, the English Wikipedia grew from less than 900,000 [1] to over 1,500,000 [2] articles. It began with elections for the Arbitration Committee and stewardship, and ended with elections for the Arbitration Committee and stewardship. This week, the Wikipedia Signpost continues our look back at the year that was 2006 in Wikipedia.
Due to a scheduling quirk, 2006 saw two annual Arbitration Committee elections. The January elections saw 11 arbitrators elected in all (originally, 8 seats were up for reelection, but to avoid high turnover on the Committee, and with a high rate of community support, Jimbo Wales chose to add three extra seats). In all, 68 candidates applied for the elections; of these, 14 withdrew during the vote.
All but one incumbent arbitrator regained a seat on the Committee ( Kelly Martin withdrew from consideration early in the vote and resigned from the committee shortly thereafter, citing personal reasons.) [3]
In December, a second election was held. In this election, the five three-year seats in Tranche Gamma were available; with the resignation of Mindspillage, who took a seat on the Foundation Board of Trustees, and the absence of Filiocht, who had not participated in arbitration due to illness, two additional two-year seats were made available. Jimbo indicated that Mindspillage and Filiocht were free to claim extra seats should they come back before their terms were due to expire in December 2008. [4] 37 candidates ran for the seats, of which 6 withdrew during the elections. The results were as follows:
Of the previous Tranche Gamma, one seat was vacant due to the resignation of Mackensen in February. [5] None of the four remaining incumbent arbitrators chose to run again. This was the first time in the Arbitration Committee's history that no incumbents attempted to defend their seats.
Oddly enough, two annual elections were also held for the global position of steward. Stewards' main jobs are to help out with the jobs of bureaucrats and CheckUsers on smaller wikis, where bureaucrats are unlikely to be active or existent, and CheckUser policies have not yet been agreed upon (only 27 individual projects, along with Wikimedia Commons and the Meta-Wiki, currently have CheckUsers). [6] While the Board of Trustees makes a final ruling on the suitability of a candidate, and can pick any candidates with at least 80% support and at least 30 support votes to become stewards, their decision in both 2006 elections was to promote all candidates who had received 80% or more.
In January 2006's elections, nine candidates were chosen: Ascánder, Ausir, Jean-Christophe Chazalette, Jon Harald Søby, Paginazero, Rdsmith4, Romihaitza, Suisui, and Walter. [7] Of the nine, two (Jean-Christophe Chazalette and Ascánder) have since resigned.
In December 2006's elections, eleven candidates were chosen: Bastique, Cspurrier, Darkoneko, Dbl2010, Drini, Effeietsanders, Guillom, M7, MaxSem, Pathoschild, Redux, and Shanel. [8]
In 2006, two new user classifications became widely used: CheckUser and Oversight. CheckUser, which was actually introduced as a formal classification in 2005, is the ability to view and compare the IP addresses of contributors when it is presumed that these users might be involved in sockpuppeting or disruption. The requests for CheckUser page, created in January 2006, has become a key site to visit by users who suspect that sockpuppeting might be occurring. [9] Oversight, meanwhile, is the ability to hide page revisions containing libel, personal informations and in extreme cases, copyright violations; it was introduced in June after the insertion of inappropriate content, particularly on busy pages like the administrators' noticeboard, where deletions caused undue stress on the servers, due to the number of revisions involved. [10] There were 17 users with oversight privileges when it was introduced; there are currently 28 users with these privileges.
A source of controversy in early 2006 was a series of disputes over userboxes. Introduced to the English Wikipedia in late March, 2005, as a way of communicating to other users the languages that a user speaks, userboxes soon became a way to express one's likes and dislikes, talents, and even edit counts. Controversy erupted in late December 2005 when Kelly Martin began deleting userboxes that she deemed controversial or offensive, and those that contained fair use images; two requests for comment were filed in the case. [11]
More controversy occurred when a pro-pedophilia userbox ignited a wheel war. Jimbo Wales temporarily de-sysopped five of the administrators who had been most involved in escalating the situation. [12] An arbitration case was hastily brought in the matter, and just five days after the case was opened, it was closed with the following remedies:
The case was the fastest arbitration case to close with remedies enacted. Although an
April arbitration case involving userboxes was filed, and resulted in the desysopping of Guanaco, most of the controversy over userboxes has since faded, as most have been moved from the template namespace into user subpages. Divisive or inflammatory userboxes are rarely seen anymore, and can be speedy deleted under
criterion T1.
Through 2005, only five users had been permanently desysopped. 11 users were permanently desysopped in 2006; other than Karmafist and Carnildo, the others are:
2006 was the biggest year Wikipedia has seen in terms of overall progress and growth. It's likely that 2007 will be even bigger, busier and more bustling. Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and thanks for reading the Signpost.
In December,
Jimbo Wales
announced the election of seven users to the
Arbitration Committee:
Blnguyen,
Flcelloguy,
FloNight,
Jpgordon,
Kirill Lokshin,
Paul August, and
UninvitedCompany. This week, the Signpost interviews the newly elected arbitrators, after just over two weeks on the job, to see how arbitration is coming along:
1. How do you feel about getting the opportunity to serve on the ArbCom?
2. What do you think of the election? Do you think they were conducted properly? What could have been improved, in your opinion?
3. What would you say to those who supported you? Opposed you?
4. What do you think of the other Wikipedians who were appointed along with you?
5. After about two weeks on the job, what are your initial thoughts?
6. How active a role do you plan to take on ArbCom workshop pages, and in writing ArbCom decisions, a role that has historically been handled mostly by just a few individuals?
7. What do you think are the strengths of the ArbCom? Weaknesses?
8. If you could change anything, what would you change? Why?
9. Do you plan on finishing your term? If you had to make a choice right now, when your term expires, would you run for re-election? Why or why not?
10. If there's one thing you could say to the Wikipedia community, what would you say, and why? Is there anything else you would like to mention?
A new software feature to guard against sophisticated "indirect" vandalism of the Main Page has been implemented. Dubbed "cascading protection", it automatically applies to local images and templates, which have been frequent targets for this type of vandalism.
As a very high-traffic page, the Main Page has long been an attractive target for vandals. Because it includes a constantly changing variety of elements, vulnerabilities have occasionally appeared when nobody thinks to protect a new element, or even an element of an element. The feature, which "cascades" the regular protection feature down to such elements, was developed primarily by Andrew Garrett ( User:Werdna). Chief Technical Officer Brion Vibber enabled it in the MediaWiki software and applied cascading protection to the Main Page at 09:55 (UTC) on 14 January.
Cascading protection operates as follows: If a page is protected using the feature, any pages included in it will also be protected for as long as they remain included in it. This protection should take effect instantly and automatically even if templates are included dynamically by a mechanism such as that used by the Main Page. Administrators can enable cascading protection by means of a checkbox on the usual protection form.
Vibber pointed out that cascading protection does not apply to images hosted on the Wikimedia Commons. This means that the image will need to be protected manually by an administrator on the Commons project. In the first few months of that project, complaints were voiced about its responsiveness to such requests, but now the matter is handled fairly routinely.
The feature was developed while a separate effort was underway to run a bot that would achieve similar results. ProtectionBot, a bot run by Dragons flight, was the subject of a much-debated request for adminship, in order to obtain the administrator-only function of protecting and unprotecting pages. This followed a request for approval of bot status, which was generally supported, but it was suggested that the issue of a bot with administrator abilities needed to be brought before a wider audience.
Once the cascading protection feature had been added to MediaWiki, Dragons flight withdrew the request on 11 January. Although he said the bot "has certain functionality that exceeds that provided by Werdna's patch, I feel the technical situation has changed too greatly for this RFA to continue to be valid." Dragons flight expressed appreciation to Garrett and the other developers who helped address the problem, while also expressing frustration with the process. Reflecting on the energy devoted to getting the bot approved, he commented, "A good idea, that can be shown to work, should not require this much effort."
At the time the request was withdrawn, there was actually a decent possibility that it would have succeeded. Counts of supporting and opposing comments at the time of withdrawal showed 185 in favor and 41 opposing, with 13 neutral or abstaining comments. Weighing supporters against opponents would put 82% in favor, slightly above the 80% threshold that has commonly been treated by bureaucrats as justifying administrator status without controversy.
A substantial portion of the opposition expressed concern that the source code for the bot was not public. Dragons flight did share the code with a number of other Wikipedians, but declined to release it generally, stating that it could easily be modified to create a vandalbot. Others remained uncertain about giving a bot abilities normally reserved for administrators.
Garrett, who came up with the solution, was actually one of those opposing the request for adminship. In his opinion, "this kind of thing needs to be implemented as part of MediaWiki", along with some of the other functions filled by bots. Others pointed out that the small number of developers makes it difficult to hope that such features would be implemented unless something forces the issue.
WikiWorld is a weekly comic, carried by the Signpost, that highlights a few of the fascinating but little-known articles in the vast Wikipedia archives. The text for each comic is excerpted from one or more existing Wikipedia articles. WikiWorld offers visual interpretations on a wide range of topics: offbeat cultural references and personality profiles, obscure moments in history and unlikely slices of everyday life - as well as "mainstream" subjects with humorous potential.
Cartoonist Greg Williams developed the WikiWorld project in cooperation with the Wikimedia Foundation, and is releasing the comics under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere. Williams works as a visual journalist for the US-based The Tampa Tribune, a daily newspaper in Tampa, Florida. He also has worked as an illustrator and designer at newspapers in Dubuque, Iowa, and Dayton, Ohio.
The Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser will conclude this week. At the end of the drive, over US$1,000,000 had been raised, not including a matching funds donation yet to be received.
After complaints over its effectiveness, and worries that it was being used inappropriately in disputes, the personal attack intervention noticeboard was shut down last week, after a deletion request.
The mailing lists for Wikipedia and other projects have changed to new addresses after the Wikimedia Foundation migrated them to a new server. All new addresses will use @lists.wikipedia.org, so that for example the English Wikipedia mailing list is now wikien-l at lists.wikipedia.org. Old addresses will still work, but the transition will include mail headers and may require recipients to adjust any filters or other settings they use to read list messages. Also note that links to old mailing list messages may point to different ones now: this is because of how the archive rebuilding process works.
A blogger for the Sydney Morning Herald, in an article critical about Wikipedia, vandalized the article Newspaper, touting its own blog as the "world's best column" [1]. The edit was reverted nearly nine hours later by Barnabypage. The page also mentions a vandalous edit to Aspirin, which was not reverted for 28 minutes [2].
Mallen Baker of Ethical Corporation Magazine, a British publication, looked at Wikipedia's article on corporate social responsibility. The author notes that POV battles have made the article "a battleground of ideologues".
CNET reporter Daniel Terdiman profiled an AFD on an article about Terdiman. Terdiman notes that compared to other CNET reporters, he might not have been notable, though the article was kept. Terdiman did, however, incorrectly refer to the AFD as an "administrators' delete-or-not thread".
Five users were granted admin status via the Requests for Adminship process this week: Kinu ( nom), Feydey ( nom), Visviva ( nom), Jersyko ( nom), and BigDT ( nom).
Twenty-two articles were promoted to featured status last week, following the previous week's zero: Avatar: The Last Airbender, Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers), Oriel College, Scottish Parliament Building, Paulins Kill, Hurricane Juan, Christopher C. Kraft, Jr., Hippocrates, Germany, Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector, Sasha (DJ), B movie, South Australian legislative election, 2006, Pilot (House), Turkey, Battle of Edson's Ridge, DNA, Diplodocus, Proteasome, Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Delaware, Immune system, and Regulamentul Organic. DNA was repromoted to FA status after losing it nearly three years ago.
Two articles were de-featured last week: Names of God in Judaism, and Sydney Riot of 1879.
Five lists were promoted to featured status last week: Chicago Bears seasons, Harry Potter films cast members, New Brunswick general elections (post-Confederation), Basil cultivars, and Nintendo 64 games.
Two portals were promoted to featured status last week: Architecture and Vancouver.
The following featured articles were displayed last week on the Main Page as Today's featured article: Invasion, Fauna of Puerto Rico, Half-Life 2, Richard III, Alcibiades, Shoshone National Forest, and Kitsune.
The following featured pictures were displayed last week on the Main Page as picture of the day: Treasury of Athens, Riffle shuffle, Dragonfly, Root canal, Phenotypes, Victoria Crater, and Pennant coralfish.
Thirteen pictures were promoted to featured status last week:
The ImageMap extension by Tim Starling has been enabled on Wikimedia sites. It is now possible for images to be easily used to link to pages, including with different areas linking to different pages. Users should remember to keep in mind the needs of browsers not capable of handling graphics well, such as screen readers and perhaps some handheld devices.
In response to the rise of indirect vandalism on the Main Page (see this Signpost article for further details), a new protection mode was added: cascading protection. If a page is protected this way, any pages included in it will also be protected for as long as they remain included in it. This protection should take effect instantly and automatically even if templates are included dynamically by a mechanism such as that used by the Main Page. Administrators can enable cascading protection by means of a checkbox on the usual protection form. ( Andrew Garrett, various revisions from r18958 to r19103)
The {{PLURAL}}
magic word now treats -1 as singular. (
Leon Weber,
r19031)
Tooltips and
accesskey shortcuts no longer require
JavaScript to use. Consequently, the way in which sysops should edit tooltips and accesskeys has changed. While it is possible to continue using the ta
array in
MediaWiki:monobook.js or
MediaWiki:common.js, it is preferable to delete that and migrate any changes to the new individual messages such as
MediaWiki:Tooltip-userpage. (
Simetrical, bugs
5051 and
5376,
r19036)
A minimum protection level for all pages in a given namespace can now be set in the site configuration. By default, the only namespace thus protected is the MediaWiki namespace, which, as before, is only editable by sysops. ( Ilmari Karonen, r19110)
A bug that prevented non-sysops from viewing the source of system messages left at their default values, such as (at the time of this writing) MediaWiki:About on the English Wikipedia, was fixed. The bug was presumably a side effect of the recent removal of such default messages from the database. ( Ilmari Karonen, r19111)
The contents of <math>
tags, when rendered as plain HTML text rather than as an image, will now always be rendered left-to-right, even on right-to-left wikis. (
Simetrical,
bug 8002,
r19143)
The page-specific CSS class now works consistently in Monobook and non-Monobook skins. ( Mormegil, bug 8643, r19299)
JavaScript authors should be aware that recently, a minor change to the document structure was made for consistency, related specifically to handheld rendering: a div with class of pBody
was wrapped around the unordered list in p-cactions
, to bring it in line with the other lists there. This will cause issues for some inflexibly-written JavaScript that depends on the precise document structure. JavaScript authors are advised to write their scripts so that they will continue to function even if wrappers are added or node order changes. For instance, the <ul>
element containing the content actions can be obtained with document.getElementById("p-cactions").getElementsByTagName("ul")[0];
, which will almost certainly work despite any structural change. (
Simetrical,
r18949)
Also, a new utility function was added for the benefit of JavaScript authors. addPortletLink()
will conveniently add a link to any of the "portlets" in Monobook, including the content actions, personal tools, navigation sidebar, and toolbox. The syntax of the function can be found in
wikibits.js. (
Ilmari Karonen,
r19185)
A number of interface changes were made:
&diffonly=0
or &diffonly=1
to the end of a diff URL will display or hide the revision text regardless of user preferences, respectively. (
Ilmari Karonen,
bug 3446,
r19141)Some updates were made to non-English messages, specifically:
Internationalization help is always appreciated! See m:Localization statistics for how complete the translations of languages you know are, and post any updates to Mediazilla.
The Arbitration Committee opened no cases this week, and closed one case.