From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rayman Raving Rabbids

I nominated Rayman Raving Rabbids for peer review because I'm trying to get this article to B-class and would appreciate any comments and suggestions on how we can make this article even better. I've fixed all the obvious problems with spelling, style, grammar, etc. but I would especially like suggestions for improvement of the reception part of the article, because I feel that is the weakest bit. firenze127 ( talk) 21:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply

You'll need a lot more references to improve this article. An easy start would be sourcing the quotes in the reception section. The lead says "The game consists of more than 70 “trials” (minigames) designed for the Wii controller", but then the article says the game is available for Xbox 360, GBA, etc. This is confusing. Pagra shtak 22:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks for responding so quickly - I understand that a statement like that is very confusing ... I'll try to make that clearer. firenze127 ( talk) 22:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Is the plot section of this complete? I just find it a bit hard to tell. -- Lenin and McCarthy | ( Complain here) 18:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I found the article short enough to be engaging and informational but I feel it needs more info. Especially about specific mini games. Historybuffc13 ( talk) 02:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I want to point out, excessive details about certain mini-games falls under game guide content. There's been discussions about this in the past. A general section about the mini-games is fine, but a list (and descriptions) of each and every game isn't suitable content for the article. Some examples of mini-games seems fine, but that's about it. RobJ1981 ( talk) 12:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rayman Raving Rabbids

I nominated Rayman Raving Rabbids for peer review because I'm trying to get this article to B-class and would appreciate any comments and suggestions on how we can make this article even better. I've fixed all the obvious problems with spelling, style, grammar, etc. but I would especially like suggestions for improvement of the reception part of the article, because I feel that is the weakest bit. firenze127 ( talk) 21:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply

You'll need a lot more references to improve this article. An easy start would be sourcing the quotes in the reception section. The lead says "The game consists of more than 70 “trials” (minigames) designed for the Wii controller", but then the article says the game is available for Xbox 360, GBA, etc. This is confusing. Pagra shtak 22:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks for responding so quickly - I understand that a statement like that is very confusing ... I'll try to make that clearer. firenze127 ( talk) 22:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Is the plot section of this complete? I just find it a bit hard to tell. -- Lenin and McCarthy | ( Complain here) 18:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I found the article short enough to be engaging and informational but I feel it needs more info. Especially about specific mini games. Historybuffc13 ( talk) 02:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I want to point out, excessive details about certain mini-games falls under game guide content. There's been discussions about this in the past. A general section about the mini-games is fine, but a list (and descriptions) of each and every game isn't suitable content for the article. Some examples of mini-games seems fine, but that's about it. RobJ1981 ( talk) 12:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook