Article is nearing FA. The text will soon be polished (I'm looking at you, interested reader). We need help citing two things:
Suggestions and advice? -- Zeality 03:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
This is minor stuff, but I notice a few of the refs read "Retrieved on 12 October 2006, 2006 [sic]". When you use the accessdate parameter of cite web, the accessyear parameter should be absent. The dates of refs use several different formats: I see YYYY-MM-DD; month DD, YYYY; and month DDth, YYYY (the latter of which is contrary to the MOS). I personally prefer [[YYYY-MM-DD]] (with the link to format) when I write ref dates, but the "th" should be removed at a minimum.
More important stuff:
Pagra shtak 21:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Article is nearing FA. The text will soon be polished (I'm looking at you, interested reader). We need help citing two things:
Suggestions and advice? -- Zeality 03:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
This is minor stuff, but I notice a few of the refs read "Retrieved on 12 October 2006, 2006 [sic]". When you use the accessdate parameter of cite web, the accessyear parameter should be absent. The dates of refs use several different formats: I see YYYY-MM-DD; month DD, YYYY; and month DDth, YYYY (the latter of which is contrary to the MOS). I personally prefer [[YYYY-MM-DD]] (with the link to format) when I write ref dates, but the "th" should be removed at a minimum.
More important stuff:
Pagra shtak 21:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)