Article promoted Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The RAAF's fighter conversion unit, which originated in WWII, disbanded in 1947, and was revived in the middle of the Korean War, when the Air Force realised there was a significant gap in its training program. Since then it's converted pilots to all of Australia's front-line fighters -- Sabre, Mirage, and F-18 Hornet. I'm thinking of taking it to FAC depending on how it goes here, so feel free to offer comments with that in mind as well. Thanks to Dank for a quick turnaround on the article's recent GAN, and Nick-D for some additional info and images. Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk) 08:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
reply
Support: couldn't see anything to pick fault with except one minor typo/whitespace issue which I fixed. Otherwise, looks good to me. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 11:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Comments I've added a few odds and ends to this article, so I may be too involved to vote, but I have the following comments:
Support On reflection, I think that I'm sufficiently uninvolved to vote, and I'm pleased to support the article's promotion. I'll be adding a little bit more material to it over the next few days, but this shouldn't have much of an effect on my overall level of involvement. Nick-D ( talk) 11:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I've looked at the changes made since I reviewed this for GAN. - Dank ( push to talk) 12:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Article promoted Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC) reply
The RAAF's fighter conversion unit, which originated in WWII, disbanded in 1947, and was revived in the middle of the Korean War, when the Air Force realised there was a significant gap in its training program. Since then it's converted pilots to all of Australia's front-line fighters -- Sabre, Mirage, and F-18 Hornet. I'm thinking of taking it to FAC depending on how it goes here, so feel free to offer comments with that in mind as well. Thanks to Dank for a quick turnaround on the article's recent GAN, and Nick-D for some additional info and images. Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk) 08:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
reply
Support: couldn't see anything to pick fault with except one minor typo/whitespace issue which I fixed. Otherwise, looks good to me. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 11:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Comments I've added a few odds and ends to this article, so I may be too involved to vote, but I have the following comments:
Support On reflection, I think that I'm sufficiently uninvolved to vote, and I'm pleased to support the article's promotion. I'll be adding a little bit more material to it over the next few days, but this shouldn't have much of an effect on my overall level of involvement. Nick-D ( talk) 11:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I've looked at the changes made since I reviewed this for GAN. - Dank ( push to talk) 12:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC) reply