Toolbox |
---|
The article has undergone a major expansion since it was last reviewed, and is now pretty well comprehensively referenced (IMHO). Ultimately I'd like to get the article to FA level, but in the meantime I certainly feel it's much better than a "B-class" article and is thus ready for A-class review. The article is currently undergoing a Peer Review, so far with no major criticisms, which further suggests the article (on an important subject) is suitable for promotion. Commander Zulu ( talk) 02:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 13:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
citation}}
, but I have left the other references for the moment. Commander Zulu, do you want to use a short ref style such as the one found in
Operation Brevity, or do you want the long reference style? Personally, I prefer the short style as it is easier to read, but it is up to you. Regards,
Woody (
talk) 11:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replyToolbox |
---|
The article has undergone a major expansion since it was last reviewed, and is now pretty well comprehensively referenced (IMHO). Ultimately I'd like to get the article to FA level, but in the meantime I certainly feel it's much better than a "B-class" article and is thus ready for A-class review. The article is currently undergoing a Peer Review, so far with no major criticisms, which further suggests the article (on an important subject) is suitable for promotion. Commander Zulu ( talk) 02:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 13:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
citation}}
, but I have left the other references for the moment. Commander Zulu, do you want to use a short ref style such as the one found in
Operation Brevity, or do you want the long reference style? Personally, I prefer the short style as it is easier to read, but it is up to you. Regards,
Woody (
talk) 11:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
reply