Toolbox |
---|
Hello! This is the second nomination of this article (the first one can be found here). The major outstanding issue in the previous nomination was prose quality, which I believe to have been rectified, with the invaluable help of Auntieruth55... Constantine ✍ 06:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Support Nicely done.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 17:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Support Very well written/sourced/illustrated, shows careful attention to detail. Given this is A-Class, there might be a small quibble with Nothing further is known about him. not actually being cited -- does no source say that explicitly? In any case, very well done. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Toolbox |
---|
Hello! This is the second nomination of this article (the first one can be found here). The major outstanding issue in the previous nomination was prose quality, which I believe to have been rectified, with the invaluable help of Auntieruth55... Constantine ✍ 06:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Support Nicely done.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 17:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Support Very well written/sourced/illustrated, shows careful attention to detail. Given this is A-Class, there might be a small quibble with Nothing further is known about him. not actually being cited -- does no source say that explicitly? In any case, very well done. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply