Article promoted by Zawed ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
IFF Mark II ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
IFF was one of the many advances of the "Wizard War" in WWII. While the Mk I and II are best considered temporary stepping stones on the path to the "real" Mk. III, it's place in history is still secure as the first operational IFF system. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 15:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Comments: After a quick read:
Other than that, good work.-- Randomness74 ( talk) 23:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Comments: G'day, Maury, interesting article. I'm well out of my depth in relation to content, so I figured I'd try to help out by looking at some of the minor aspects. I have the following suggestions/observations: AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Support I've wondered how World War II-era IFF systems worked, so it's good to see a high quality article on the topic. My only comment is that the article should explain what a "Geneva mechanism" is. Nick-D ( talk) 03:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Support Looks good. Interesting article. Is there a publisher for fn 2? And a citation is required for the last sentence in the Mark I section. Otherwise, my only suggestion is that squitter doesn't need italics; put it in quotes like "pip-squeak". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Support Comments Interesting read. A few suggestions: /~
hue
sat
lum/
17:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
G'day Maury Markowitz just a reminder that there are a few outstanding comments here. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about my disappearing act everyone. I believe everything above has been addressed. I did not add nbsp's, and Watt didn't become Watson-Watt until after this period. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 21:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The difference in citation style is that when I have a source that is used only in a limited location, I put it inline. I do not know anything about the dates, that's something the wiki markup is doing. I have changed the cite on pip-squeek, but was that arbcom about Goebel? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 12:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
I removed it. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 00:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Images - both images used in the article are correctly licensed.
Parsecboy (
talk) 11:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Source Review - All secondary sources reliable and of high quality, primary sources are appropriately used.
Kges1901 (
talk)
01:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Article promoted by Zawed ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
IFF Mark II ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
IFF was one of the many advances of the "Wizard War" in WWII. While the Mk I and II are best considered temporary stepping stones on the path to the "real" Mk. III, it's place in history is still secure as the first operational IFF system. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 15:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Comments: After a quick read:
Other than that, good work.-- Randomness74 ( talk) 23:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Comments: G'day, Maury, interesting article. I'm well out of my depth in relation to content, so I figured I'd try to help out by looking at some of the minor aspects. I have the following suggestions/observations: AustralianRupert ( talk) 09:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Support I've wondered how World War II-era IFF systems worked, so it's good to see a high quality article on the topic. My only comment is that the article should explain what a "Geneva mechanism" is. Nick-D ( talk) 03:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Support Looks good. Interesting article. Is there a publisher for fn 2? And a citation is required for the last sentence in the Mark I section. Otherwise, my only suggestion is that squitter doesn't need italics; put it in quotes like "pip-squeak". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Support Comments Interesting read. A few suggestions: /~
hue
sat
lum/
17:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
G'day Maury Markowitz just a reminder that there are a few outstanding comments here. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about my disappearing act everyone. I believe everything above has been addressed. I did not add nbsp's, and Watt didn't become Watson-Watt until after this period. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 21:21, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
The difference in citation style is that when I have a source that is used only in a limited location, I put it inline. I do not know anything about the dates, that's something the wiki markup is doing. I have changed the cite on pip-squeek, but was that arbcom about Goebel? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 12:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
I removed it. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 00:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Images - both images used in the article are correctly licensed.
Parsecboy (
talk) 11:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Source Review - All secondary sources reliable and of high quality, primary sources are appropriately used.
Kges1901 (
talk)
01:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)