Article promoted Hawkeye7 ( talk) 04:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it was recently withdrawn from a
Featured Article Nomination, primarily over sourcing issues. It achieved Good Article status in February and I would very much like to renominate it for Featured Article as soon as possible. Comments and criticisms are always welcome! Fire away.
Palm_Dogg (
talk) 14:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I had a good look at this at the FAC. - Dank ( push to talk) 03:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Support Comments: I'm happy to accept Dank's endorsement of prose and what I read (I couldn't get through all of it) looked quite good. Obviously a lot of work has gone into this. I have the following comments:
Support Very readable account of operations in Anbar. Very well referenced. I could see no obvious problems. Good use of images and graphics. Cuprum17 ( talk) 23:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Article promoted Hawkeye7 ( talk) 04:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it was recently withdrawn from a
Featured Article Nomination, primarily over sourcing issues. It achieved Good Article status in February and I would very much like to renominate it for Featured Article as soon as possible. Comments and criticisms are always welcome! Fire away.
Palm_Dogg (
talk) 14:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I had a good look at this at the FAC. - Dank ( push to talk) 03:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Support Comments: I'm happy to accept Dank's endorsement of prose and what I read (I couldn't get through all of it) looked quite good. Obviously a lot of work has gone into this. I have the following comments:
Support Very readable account of operations in Anbar. Very well referenced. I could see no obvious problems. Good use of images and graphics. Cuprum17 ( talk) 23:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply