The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hydrochloric acid ambiguous links:
Nice, what? Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC).
en.wikipedia.org, by Edits (reverse), with Page = Hydrochloric_acid
Edits ↑ | User | first edit | last edit |
---|---|---|---|
390 (367/23) | Wimvandorst | 2005-02-12 17:34 | 2009-02-14 22:10 |
50 (47/3) | Cacycle | 2005-03-13 22:02 | 2008-08-31 00:05 |
36 (12/24) | Edgar181 | 2006-05-15 14:50 | 2009-02-24 12:52 |
27 (13/14) | Walkerma | 2005-03-18 05:58 | 2007-07-23 04:47 |
25 (14/11) | Jag123 | 2005-03-03 17:25 | 2005-04-25 05:31 |
23 (18/5) | H Padleckas | 2005-01-28 15:51 | 2005-12-19 23:47 |
21 (6/15) | Eleassar777 | 2005-04-25 10:18 | 2005-05-04 18:36 |
18 (8/10) | Worldtraveller | 2005-02-19 10:14 | 2006-02-06 23:22 |
16 (5/11) | ClueBot (bot) | 2007-09-20 22:17 | 2009-02-19 16:25 |
14 (7/7) | Rifleman 82 | 2007-02-13 15:37 | 2008-05-12 18:16 |
14 (14/0) | SandyGeorgia | 2008-08-29 01:54 | 2008-09-11 09:32 |
13 (13/0) | Beetstra | 2006-06-26 17:59 | 2007-01-29 15:37 |
11 (11/0) | Karlhahn | 2007-10-30 21:23 | 2008-03-31 15:04 |
11 (9/2) | Physchim62 | 2005-05-22 13:28 | 2009-01-08 09:13 |
10 (0/10) | Freestyle-69 | 2008-07-30 07:39 | 2009-02-24 01:14 |
We're all there! Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC).
Ref | Metadata | External link | Code | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|
External MSDS [ox.ac.uk] | 200 | |||
6 | publisher=International Narcotics Control Board | List of precursors and chemicals frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and pychotropic substances under international control [incb.org] | 200 | |
9 | accessdate=2008-09-06 publisher=ChemBuddy.com | Dissociation constants pKa and pKb [chembuddy.com] | 200 | |
accessdate=2008-09-02 publisher=EUR-lex | Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances [europa.eu] | 200 | ||
13 | date=13/09/2003 publisher=Daily Telegraph | Household plc: really filthy bathroom [telegraph.co.uk] | 301 | Redirect does not contain ".,?&" |
accessdate=2008-09-02 publisher=EUR-lex | Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances [europa.eu] | 200 | ||
Density table for hydrochloric acid [chembuddy.com] | 200 | |||
16 | accessdate=2007-09-12 publisher=United States | Environmental Protection Agency HCl score card [scorecard.org] | 200 | |
Hydrochloric acid MSDS by American Bioanalytical [americanbio.com] | 200 | |||
NIST WebBook, general link [nist.gov] | 200 | |||
EPA Hazard Summary [epa.gov] | 200 | |||
Hydrochloric acid MSDS by Georgia Institute of Technology [gatech.edu] | 200 | |||
National Pollutant Inventory - Hydrochloric Acid Fact Sheet [npi.gov.au] | 200 |
I fixed ref 13. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC).
The automatically determined readability indices are not useful: they include all text from the article, including tables, chemical formulae, and references. So the results are not indicative of the free flowing text. I think we should only assess the lede by this method. I'll try to determined values for this. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC).
Counts | |
---|---|
Words | 158 |
Characters | 1040 |
Sentences | 8 |
Letters | 821 |
Syllables | 265 |
Polysyllabic words | 31 |
Averages | |
Characters per word | 6.58 |
Letters per word | 5.20 |
Syllables per word | 1.82 |
Words per sentence | 19.75 |
Simply fooled the system. I copied the lede to a Sandbox page, and had that assessed. The table is the result from its assessment page. These indicate that this introductory text is well off the Fry readability scale. I wonder wether this is a useful indicator for article like these. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC).
Just notes for the moment! Physchim62 (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Like PC, these are just some notes.
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hydrochloric acid ambiguous links:
Nice, what? Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC).
en.wikipedia.org, by Edits (reverse), with Page = Hydrochloric_acid
Edits ↑ | User | first edit | last edit |
---|---|---|---|
390 (367/23) | Wimvandorst | 2005-02-12 17:34 | 2009-02-14 22:10 |
50 (47/3) | Cacycle | 2005-03-13 22:02 | 2008-08-31 00:05 |
36 (12/24) | Edgar181 | 2006-05-15 14:50 | 2009-02-24 12:52 |
27 (13/14) | Walkerma | 2005-03-18 05:58 | 2007-07-23 04:47 |
25 (14/11) | Jag123 | 2005-03-03 17:25 | 2005-04-25 05:31 |
23 (18/5) | H Padleckas | 2005-01-28 15:51 | 2005-12-19 23:47 |
21 (6/15) | Eleassar777 | 2005-04-25 10:18 | 2005-05-04 18:36 |
18 (8/10) | Worldtraveller | 2005-02-19 10:14 | 2006-02-06 23:22 |
16 (5/11) | ClueBot (bot) | 2007-09-20 22:17 | 2009-02-19 16:25 |
14 (7/7) | Rifleman 82 | 2007-02-13 15:37 | 2008-05-12 18:16 |
14 (14/0) | SandyGeorgia | 2008-08-29 01:54 | 2008-09-11 09:32 |
13 (13/0) | Beetstra | 2006-06-26 17:59 | 2007-01-29 15:37 |
11 (11/0) | Karlhahn | 2007-10-30 21:23 | 2008-03-31 15:04 |
11 (9/2) | Physchim62 | 2005-05-22 13:28 | 2009-01-08 09:13 |
10 (0/10) | Freestyle-69 | 2008-07-30 07:39 | 2009-02-24 01:14 |
We're all there! Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC).
Ref | Metadata | External link | Code | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|
External MSDS [ox.ac.uk] | 200 | |||
6 | publisher=International Narcotics Control Board | List of precursors and chemicals frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and pychotropic substances under international control [incb.org] | 200 | |
9 | accessdate=2008-09-06 publisher=ChemBuddy.com | Dissociation constants pKa and pKb [chembuddy.com] | 200 | |
accessdate=2008-09-02 publisher=EUR-lex | Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances [europa.eu] | 200 | ||
13 | date=13/09/2003 publisher=Daily Telegraph | Household plc: really filthy bathroom [telegraph.co.uk] | 301 | Redirect does not contain ".,?&" |
accessdate=2008-09-02 publisher=EUR-lex | Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances [europa.eu] | 200 | ||
Density table for hydrochloric acid [chembuddy.com] | 200 | |||
16 | accessdate=2007-09-12 publisher=United States | Environmental Protection Agency HCl score card [scorecard.org] | 200 | |
Hydrochloric acid MSDS by American Bioanalytical [americanbio.com] | 200 | |||
NIST WebBook, general link [nist.gov] | 200 | |||
EPA Hazard Summary [epa.gov] | 200 | |||
Hydrochloric acid MSDS by Georgia Institute of Technology [gatech.edu] | 200 | |||
National Pollutant Inventory - Hydrochloric Acid Fact Sheet [npi.gov.au] | 200 |
I fixed ref 13. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC).
The automatically determined readability indices are not useful: they include all text from the article, including tables, chemical formulae, and references. So the results are not indicative of the free flowing text. I think we should only assess the lede by this method. I'll try to determined values for this. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC).
Counts | |
---|---|
Words | 158 |
Characters | 1040 |
Sentences | 8 |
Letters | 821 |
Syllables | 265 |
Polysyllabic words | 31 |
Averages | |
Characters per word | 6.58 |
Letters per word | 5.20 |
Syllables per word | 1.82 |
Words per sentence | 19.75 |
Simply fooled the system. I copied the lede to a Sandbox page, and had that assessed. The table is the result from its assessment page. These indicate that this introductory text is well off the Fry readability scale. I wonder wether this is a useful indicator for article like these. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC).
Just notes for the moment! Physchim62 (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Like PC, these are just some notes.