The peer review department of the Bangladesh WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Bangladesh WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.
Purge page cache | Watch this page |
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.
peer-review=yes
to the {{
WP Bangladesh}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the
project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top.~~~~
).{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the
list of requests on this page.Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
peer-review=yes
with old-peer-review=yes
in the {{
WP Bangladesh}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the
current archive page.The article has been enhanced to a good extent. Still it needs addition of few important bits of information. Please contribute.
Sabih Omar 10:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
This article has come a long way in respect to Bangladesh location articles, and may well represent, I hope, a guiding article for more than 400 other articles in the category of Bangladesh upazilas. These articles do need a guiding way, which is currently being discussed here. That is exactly why it needs careful reviewing and development. Please, comment on everything from writing style to arrangement, and from sources and citations to neutrality and notability of the stuff that went in there. The next few steps for the article will be to take it to GA, then get the League of Copywriters to take a look at it. Thanks. Aditya( talk • contribs) 17:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Otherwise the article is great. Should have been GA long ago. Arman ( Talk) 02:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
This is my basic observation. I may give another review if possible. Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
More observations
Amartyabag TALK2ME 14:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Amartyabag TALK2ME 10:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Amartyabag
TALK2ME 16:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Done
Yes, the article is going on the right track. Don't get disheartened it will surely achieve FA. One more thing i want to add is that, pls correct the citations, u can use WP:CITET for help and if possible create a navigational template on Chittagong division or Upazilas of BD. Amartyabag TALK2ME 11:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Serious problem with the copy. Can someone go a bit specific on the copy, so a poor copywriter like me can follow the suggestions and get it fixed at least to a decent state? Aditya( talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Paragraph 1 is a little unclear (in terms of history).
After the defeat of Sultan Ghiyasuddin Mahmud Shah by Sher Shah Suri in 1538, the Arakanese captured the region. The region was under the control of Portuguese pirates with Magh origins. In 1666, Mughal commander Bujurg Umed Khan conquered the area. [1]
The sentence on Portugal seems almost random, and if another clarifying sentence was given, talking about how the portugese took control, it would be more easy to read. Done
Baka man 20:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I've listed this article for peer review under multiple wikiprojects because I'd like to get some creative feedback to take this article to GA status. Thanks,
Arman ( Talk) 05:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, which some editors find useful and others do not. Be aware that not all automatically generated comments may be applicable.
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 12 Meter, use 12 Meter, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 12 Meter.
[?]You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan 08:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
The article has around 30 sources. Would really appreciate some feedback.
The article is about a Bangladeshi conglomerate. Some feedback would really be appreciated .
The peer review department of the Bangladesh WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Bangladesh WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.
Purge page cache | Watch this page |
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.
peer-review=yes
to the {{
WP Bangladesh}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the
project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top.~~~~
).{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the
list of requests on this page.Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
peer-review=yes
with old-peer-review=yes
in the {{
WP Bangladesh}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the
current archive page.The article has been enhanced to a good extent. Still it needs addition of few important bits of information. Please contribute.
Sabih Omar 10:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
This article has come a long way in respect to Bangladesh location articles, and may well represent, I hope, a guiding article for more than 400 other articles in the category of Bangladesh upazilas. These articles do need a guiding way, which is currently being discussed here. That is exactly why it needs careful reviewing and development. Please, comment on everything from writing style to arrangement, and from sources and citations to neutrality and notability of the stuff that went in there. The next few steps for the article will be to take it to GA, then get the League of Copywriters to take a look at it. Thanks. Aditya( talk • contribs) 17:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Otherwise the article is great. Should have been GA long ago. Arman ( Talk) 02:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
This is my basic observation. I may give another review if possible. Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
More observations
Amartyabag TALK2ME 14:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Amartyabag TALK2ME 10:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Amartyabag
TALK2ME 16:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Done
Yes, the article is going on the right track. Don't get disheartened it will surely achieve FA. One more thing i want to add is that, pls correct the citations, u can use WP:CITET for help and if possible create a navigational template on Chittagong division or Upazilas of BD. Amartyabag TALK2ME 11:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Serious problem with the copy. Can someone go a bit specific on the copy, so a poor copywriter like me can follow the suggestions and get it fixed at least to a decent state? Aditya( talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Paragraph 1 is a little unclear (in terms of history).
After the defeat of Sultan Ghiyasuddin Mahmud Shah by Sher Shah Suri in 1538, the Arakanese captured the region. The region was under the control of Portuguese pirates with Magh origins. In 1666, Mughal commander Bujurg Umed Khan conquered the area. [1]
The sentence on Portugal seems almost random, and if another clarifying sentence was given, talking about how the portugese took control, it would be more easy to read. Done
Baka man 20:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I've listed this article for peer review under multiple wikiprojects because I'd like to get some creative feedback to take this article to GA status. Thanks,
Arman ( Talk) 05:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, which some editors find useful and others do not. Be aware that not all automatically generated comments may be applicable.
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 12 Meter, use 12 Meter, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 12 Meter.
[?]You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan 08:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
The article has around 30 sources. Would really appreciate some feedback.
The article is about a Bangladeshi conglomerate. Some feedback would really be appreciated .