Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< December 23 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 25 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I don't understand why the page is getting deleted. It/the artist meets the criteria for musicians and ensemble ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles). I get that it needs to have reliable sources, but my sources include reviews from objective websites and music magazines, non-promotional articles and interviews with some of Norway's biggest radio stations and music websites. And so on. I will try and find more sources, but I still feel like this page should get accepted. Nathalieknudsen ( talk) 09:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Please help me to make a wiki page for my organization my page was rejected because they said that "the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic"
below is my last submission on wikipedia please help me to resubmit a valid wiki page with valid information.
[Article attempt removed - Ian.thomson ( talk)]
Thankyou. Haris Naeem 11:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Tm 12172018 (
talk)
12:42, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi team,
I would greatly appreciate some additional advice on the creation of the DaVinci Resolve article, and ensuring it meets Wikipedia's quality standards.
I strongly feel that this software deserves its own article, given that:
I have included multiple articles from established third-party publications to establish notability (a valid concern raised during the first submission); however, despite attempts to maintain a neutral tone, the remaining concerns are that it's too promotional.
Please advise what steps can be taken to increase the level of neutrality of the article to an acceptable level, without removing the articles which demonstrate its notability. I have already made the list of films & TV more concise, in response to concerns over coatrack creation.
Thank you.
IAmTheNeil ( talk) 15:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
strongly feel: see WP:ILIKEIT.
It often used in conjunction with various applications which have their own articlesand
Applications that are integrated directly into it as modules (e.g. Blackmagic_Fusion) have dedicated articles for their standalone versions: see WP:NOTINHERITED.
Similar applications have their own articles: see WP:OTHERSTUFF
It is one of the industry-leading products for its field: then there should be plenty of professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources that are not dependent upon nor affiliated with DaVinci Resolve. I've not gone through every single source in the article, but it does seem that you've probably got those.
Editorofstudy ( talk) 18:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi
This summer I was asked to write an Wikipedia page on Anthony Pioppi (I was asked by Pioppi himself); he has written several books on golf. My draft has been declined because although he has written a lot, his name is not per-say "notable." I was wondering what the likelihood of him receiving a Wikipedia page is. I do wish to keep trying to get his page out there, but only if possible. Let me know what you think. Thank you.
Emma DeGrandi
Emmadegrandi ( talk) 23:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< December 23 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 25 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I don't understand why the page is getting deleted. It/the artist meets the criteria for musicians and ensemble ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles). I get that it needs to have reliable sources, but my sources include reviews from objective websites and music magazines, non-promotional articles and interviews with some of Norway's biggest radio stations and music websites. And so on. I will try and find more sources, but I still feel like this page should get accepted. Nathalieknudsen ( talk) 09:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Please help me to make a wiki page for my organization my page was rejected because they said that "the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic"
below is my last submission on wikipedia please help me to resubmit a valid wiki page with valid information.
[Article attempt removed - Ian.thomson ( talk)]
Thankyou. Haris Naeem 11:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Tm 12172018 (
talk)
12:42, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi team,
I would greatly appreciate some additional advice on the creation of the DaVinci Resolve article, and ensuring it meets Wikipedia's quality standards.
I strongly feel that this software deserves its own article, given that:
I have included multiple articles from established third-party publications to establish notability (a valid concern raised during the first submission); however, despite attempts to maintain a neutral tone, the remaining concerns are that it's too promotional.
Please advise what steps can be taken to increase the level of neutrality of the article to an acceptable level, without removing the articles which demonstrate its notability. I have already made the list of films & TV more concise, in response to concerns over coatrack creation.
Thank you.
IAmTheNeil ( talk) 15:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
strongly feel: see WP:ILIKEIT.
It often used in conjunction with various applications which have their own articlesand
Applications that are integrated directly into it as modules (e.g. Blackmagic_Fusion) have dedicated articles for their standalone versions: see WP:NOTINHERITED.
Similar applications have their own articles: see WP:OTHERSTUFF
It is one of the industry-leading products for its field: then there should be plenty of professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources that are not dependent upon nor affiliated with DaVinci Resolve. I've not gone through every single source in the article, but it does seem that you've probably got those.
Editorofstudy ( talk) 18:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi
This summer I was asked to write an Wikipedia page on Anthony Pioppi (I was asked by Pioppi himself); he has written several books on golf. My draft has been declined because although he has written a lot, his name is not per-say "notable." I was wondering what the likelihood of him receiving a Wikipedia page is. I do wish to keep trying to get his page out there, but only if possible. Let me know what you think. Thank you.
Emma DeGrandi
Emmadegrandi ( talk) 23:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)