The women in archaeology task force of WikiProject Archaeology aims to counter Wikipedia's systematic bias by improving its coverage of female archaeologists and women-related topics in archaeology.
The scope of the task force is, primarily, biographies of female archaeologists (see Category:Women archaeologists), but also other topics broadly related to women in archaeology (e.g. Feminist archaeology, Women in ancient Rome).
The task force's project category is Category:Women in archaeology articles which is automatically populated with all articles that:
This category is used for the task force's tracking and metrics, so all articles in its scope should be tagged this way.
Category:Women archaeologists is the task force's main feeder category. All biographies of female archaeologists should be added to this category, and it should be periodically checked for new entries that need to be tagged.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Red links turned blue: 57.5% complete | ||
When the task force was created in August 2016, there were 106 entries on the WikiProject Women in Red Archaeology Redlist. This milestone tracks progress in turning all of them blue, by creating articles or stubs on notable female archaeologists.
There is also a longer, bot-maintained red list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Archaeologists.
List newly created articles here, with their author, creation date and, if applicable, DYK credit, here:
1121 articles assessed: 100% complete | |
1,121
Grading scheme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
963 non-stub articles: 85.9% complete | ||
Stubs are better than nothing, but not good enough!
89 B-Class or above articles: 7.9% complete | ||
According to the Version 1.0 assessment criteria, B-class articles are "mostly complete" and "without any major problem" – eventually we should be able to get all articles up to this standard.
18 Featured, A-Class or Good Articles: 1.6% complete | ||
More prominent figures and women in archaeology-related topics should be targeted for Good Article or Featured Article status. Note that both these classes require a formal review process; "A-Class" articles are of similar quality, but can be assessed as such by any member of the WikiProject. Any A-Class articles should be nominated for GA or FA.
(Generated by JL-bot)
The project should aim to get as much recognition for women in archaeology-related articles as possible.
This is a list of recognized content, updated weekly by JL-Bot ( talk · contribs) (typically on Saturdays). There is no need to edit the list yourself. If an article is missing from the list, make sure it is tagged or categorized (e.g. Category:Women in archaeology articles) correctly and wait for the next update. See WP:RECOG for configuration options. |
The women in archaeology task force of WikiProject Archaeology aims to counter Wikipedia's systematic bias by improving its coverage of female archaeologists and women-related topics in archaeology.
The scope of the task force is, primarily, biographies of female archaeologists (see Category:Women archaeologists), but also other topics broadly related to women in archaeology (e.g. Feminist archaeology, Women in ancient Rome).
The task force's project category is Category:Women in archaeology articles which is automatically populated with all articles that:
This category is used for the task force's tracking and metrics, so all articles in its scope should be tagged this way.
Category:Women archaeologists is the task force's main feeder category. All biographies of female archaeologists should be added to this category, and it should be periodically checked for new entries that need to be tagged.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Red links turned blue: 57.5% complete | ||
When the task force was created in August 2016, there were 106 entries on the WikiProject Women in Red Archaeology Redlist. This milestone tracks progress in turning all of them blue, by creating articles or stubs on notable female archaeologists.
There is also a longer, bot-maintained red list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Archaeologists.
List newly created articles here, with their author, creation date and, if applicable, DYK credit, here:
1121 articles assessed: 100% complete | |
1,121
Grading scheme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
963 non-stub articles: 85.9% complete | ||
Stubs are better than nothing, but not good enough!
89 B-Class or above articles: 7.9% complete | ||
According to the Version 1.0 assessment criteria, B-class articles are "mostly complete" and "without any major problem" – eventually we should be able to get all articles up to this standard.
18 Featured, A-Class or Good Articles: 1.6% complete | ||
More prominent figures and women in archaeology-related topics should be targeted for Good Article or Featured Article status. Note that both these classes require a formal review process; "A-Class" articles are of similar quality, but can be assessed as such by any member of the WikiProject. Any A-Class articles should be nominated for GA or FA.
(Generated by JL-bot)
The project should aim to get as much recognition for women in archaeology-related articles as possible.
This is a list of recognized content, updated weekly by JL-Bot ( talk · contribs) (typically on Saturdays). There is no need to edit the list yourself. If an article is missing from the list, make sure it is tagged or categorized (e.g. Category:Women in archaeology articles) correctly and wait for the next update. See WP:RECOG for configuration options. |