Original research. Apparently a user named 3ebnut on Kuro5hin came up with this, and posted it to that site about a year ago. Google reveals Kuro5hin, Wikipedia and clones, and a Selectsmart quiz, which I presume the same guy created. -- WOT 19:53, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't the onus of evidence rest on the article (especially if you're going to cast a vote to keep)? A circumstantial bit against it (in my view) is that it was originally posted by an anonymous user. I've since found one other reference to it on an unnotable "this-is-not-a-blog" blog where the author refers to it in a discussion of the Nolan Chart, citing Wikipedia as his source for the Vosem Chart ( [1]). This, to me, is a reason to delete the article before it can further exploit Wikipedia's authority. The Kuro5hin link could go to the bottom of the Nolan Chart page. -- WOT 21:58, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Original research. Apparently a user named 3ebnut on Kuro5hin came up with this, and posted it to that site about a year ago. Google reveals Kuro5hin, Wikipedia and clones, and a Selectsmart quiz, which I presume the same guy created. -- WOT 19:53, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't the onus of evidence rest on the article (especially if you're going to cast a vote to keep)? A circumstantial bit against it (in my view) is that it was originally posted by an anonymous user. I've since found one other reference to it on an unnotable "this-is-not-a-blog" blog where the author refers to it in a discussion of the Nolan Chart, citing Wikipedia as his source for the Vosem Chart ( [1]). This, to me, is a reason to delete the article before it can further exploit Wikipedia's authority. The Kuro5hin link could go to the bottom of the Nolan Chart page. -- WOT 21:58, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)