Some archives were renumbered to correct an error resulting from the original configuration of the archiving bot. If this is not the page you were expecting, please try Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive 2013 11. |
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Good work on the progress, but there are number of problems rendering the London Underground article:
Thanks Edgepedia ( talk) 09:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
and adding text after the link.
Edgepedia ( talk) 17:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Loading a page with a reasonably long technical infobox covers my screen in a huge, crossed-out green blob. Can it be smaller? wing gundam 12:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
It seems like the most complicated elements cannot be edited in this mode. Adding references seems like the biggest challenge for new editors, but that's impossible in this mode. Also not being able to modify visual content seems limiting. Lenacardell ( talk) 09:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
wen will the updated visual editor be ready? it has been almost 4 months since its launch, and nothing seems to have been fixed! Kailash29792 ( talk) 02:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Two issues:
— Ganeshk ( talk) 04:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Weitzhandler ( talk) 11:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I dont know how to add upper case like in "15th" century. Juandev ( talk) 08:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
No way to add image? I dont see a button to insert image:-( Juandev ( talk) 08:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
If possible:
Undock the toolbar that contains the Paragraph dropdown menu and the other formatting buttons - that would make editing large articles way more convenient
Implement copy and paste (right now it works but all formatting is lost when pasting)
great work so far! Derhinniger ( talk) 14:33, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I use Visual Editor in Chrome, stable release. I've tried it in Firefox and Safari too. Every time I go to submit changes, the "Save page" button hangs indefinitely. The changes are actually committed, as reloading the page demonstrates (although a dialog box mentions a server error). — wing gundam 00:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Preferably via drag & drop from the desktop, like on Facebook. Timwi ( talk) 17:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I was told on the following page that I can provide feedback here [1]. I'm doing that, and I hope that it will be taken seriously. I just added the date for development on that page. I have no idea why that wouldn't be among the first things you would say about a project. They've been talking about this for months and years now, and it's really irritating for a user that they can't easily know if this is even being taken seriously and what is being done and how and when... perhaps there is more involved, but it's hard to find any information about it without wading through really long conversations. There's a great resource for learning about these things... it's called Wikipedia. If you want to actually engage users like the whole point of this thing is intended, the following information is among the minimal, basic information needed in order to do that, both at that site above and here on the mediawiki project page:
NittyG ( talk) 16:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Some archives were renumbered to correct an error resulting from the original configuration of the archiving bot. If this is not the page you were expecting, please try Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive 2013 11. |
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
Good work on the progress, but there are number of problems rendering the London Underground article:
Thanks Edgepedia ( talk) 09:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
and adding text after the link.
Edgepedia ( talk) 17:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Loading a page with a reasonably long technical infobox covers my screen in a huge, crossed-out green blob. Can it be smaller? wing gundam 12:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
It seems like the most complicated elements cannot be edited in this mode. Adding references seems like the biggest challenge for new editors, but that's impossible in this mode. Also not being able to modify visual content seems limiting. Lenacardell ( talk) 09:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
wen will the updated visual editor be ready? it has been almost 4 months since its launch, and nothing seems to have been fixed! Kailash29792 ( talk) 02:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Two issues:
— Ganeshk ( talk) 04:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Weitzhandler ( talk) 11:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
I dont know how to add upper case like in "15th" century. Juandev ( talk) 08:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
No way to add image? I dont see a button to insert image:-( Juandev ( talk) 08:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
If possible:
Undock the toolbar that contains the Paragraph dropdown menu and the other formatting buttons - that would make editing large articles way more convenient
Implement copy and paste (right now it works but all formatting is lost when pasting)
great work so far! Derhinniger ( talk) 14:33, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I use Visual Editor in Chrome, stable release. I've tried it in Firefox and Safari too. Every time I go to submit changes, the "Save page" button hangs indefinitely. The changes are actually committed, as reloading the page demonstrates (although a dialog box mentions a server error). — wing gundam 00:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Preferably via drag & drop from the desktop, like on Facebook. Timwi ( talk) 17:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I was told on the following page that I can provide feedback here [1]. I'm doing that, and I hope that it will be taken seriously. I just added the date for development on that page. I have no idea why that wouldn't be among the first things you would say about a project. They've been talking about this for months and years now, and it's really irritating for a user that they can't easily know if this is even being taken seriously and what is being done and how and when... perhaps there is more involved, but it's hard to find any information about it without wading through really long conversations. There's a great resource for learning about these things... it's called Wikipedia. If you want to actually engage users like the whole point of this thing is intended, the following information is among the minimal, basic information needed in order to do that, both at that site above and here on the mediawiki project page:
NittyG ( talk) 16:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)