Redeye Sailboat

Reason

This is a high EV image.

Articles this image appears in

RedEye
Advertising
Sailboat

Creator

TonyTheTiger

• Support as nominator -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 00:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
• Strong Oppose Redeye is a magazine, how is their logo on a boat even remotely enough EV to justify the requirements of a VPC for any of those articles? —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 00:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Also to add, this is probably a copyright violation of their logo using it here. —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 00:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
  • As far as the copyright of the logo goes. I dont think it gets any copyright. Its a very simple logo consisting of text and simple geometric shapes. See Template:PD-textlogo for more details. -- JovianEye ( talk) 03:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
    • It's close to the threshold of originality... —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 03:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Even if it does surpass the threshold of originality (which I don't believe it does), it falls under de minimis and is thus not a copyright violation. Juliancolton ( talk) 00:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply
        • Again I'd say it would be very marginally close to falling under de minimis, but irregardless it holds virtually zero EV in all of it's uses. —  raeky ^{( talk |  edits)} 01:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - the boat's not at her best, (headsail furled and a reef in the main), so I don't see the EV as being quite there. - Bilby ( talk) 05:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Not enough EV for any of these articles. -- Elekhh ( talk) 01:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply
• Oppose See the all the comments above. -- Extra 999 ( Contact ^me + _contribs) 16:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Not promoted -- Jujutacular  ^talk 14:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply