Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 (2nd nomination)
- Reason
- This is a unique depiction of a historic part of Chicago. It has high EV. This previously failed at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 prior to restoration and then failed at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 after restoration
- Articles this image appears in
-
Michigan Avenue (Chicago)
Historic Michigan Boulevard District - Creator
- Copyright by Kaufmann, Weimer & Fabry Co, Chicago; restored and alternate versions by Smalljim ( talk · contribs) at the Graphics Lab
- Support as nominator As a pano, the curvature does not bother me and thus, I mildly prefer the original, but support both. -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support the second one. Spongie555 ( talk) 23:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support compelling detailed view of historic Chicago. Slight preference for retouched original. -- Elekhh ( talk) 12:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I kind of like the non-curvature one, but the pixelation is quite annoying. Therefore I don't have a preference. Nergaal ( talk) 02:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support both Both have high EV, no real preference. Acather96 ( talk) 20:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911.jpg -- Spongie555 ( talk) 03:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 (2nd nomination)
- Reason
- This is a unique depiction of a historic part of Chicago. It has high EV. This previously failed at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 prior to restoration and then failed at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911 after restoration
- Articles this image appears in
-
Michigan Avenue (Chicago)
Historic Michigan Boulevard District - Creator
- Copyright by Kaufmann, Weimer & Fabry Co, Chicago; restored and alternate versions by Smalljim ( talk · contribs) at the Graphics Lab
- Support as nominator As a pano, the curvature does not bother me and thus, I mildly prefer the original, but support both. -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support the second one. Spongie555 ( talk) 23:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support compelling detailed view of historic Chicago. Slight preference for retouched original. -- Elekhh ( talk) 12:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I kind of like the non-curvature one, but the pixelation is quite annoying. Therefore I don't have a preference. Nergaal ( talk) 02:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support both Both have high EV, no real preference. Acather96 ( talk) 20:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Chicago Michigan Avenue 1911.jpg -- Spongie555 ( talk) 03:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)