The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
No albums, no singles, no members with articles. No improvement to navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 22:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 August 23. ✗ plicit 23:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Single-use. Substitute on CB Avenida. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Used on the wrong articles and no mainspace article for this template to be substituted on. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused roster list. Outdated as the main article, Basket Zaragoza has an up to date list as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused with only one link and redundant to Template:PatriotsHOF. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused navbox with no mainspace article for the topic. There is no Cresta series that I could find that matches with the games listed. Other than the similarity of the titles. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Two links outside of the main article. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused timeline chart. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 00:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Per guidance at WP:CSC Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the near future. So, this notice forbidding all redlinks is in complete violation of guidance. I found it by clicking on the edit button of List of web directories, but the transclusions link above doesn't show it links to anything. As a side note, the criteria listed on the talk page also points exactly to CSC #1 guidance which allows the redlinks provided they have citations... Huggums537 ( talk) 18:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Ok, I just remembered why I went for outright deletion, and not just a discussion about amending redlinks. It is because the template also calls for every entry in the list to have a Wikipedia article against guidance, and there is probably just too much to amend here. The only guidance that allows for just Wikipedia articles only is WP:LISTPEOPLE, and this list is not about people. Establishing a list based on "Wikipedia articles only" violates WP:SELFREF, WP:CIRCULAR, MOS:OVERLINK, or more like MOS:SEAOFBLUE and WP:Blue Sea with a sea of blue, plus is not encyclopedic since it doesn't allow other notable entries such as redlinks, redirects, or other plain text notable mentions. There was also no prior consensus for restricting the list to "just Wikipedia articles only". There is a big difference between some of the suggestions for a "notable list", and that of a "Wikipedia articles only". Huggums537 ( talk) 19:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance, not just verifiable existence.Requiring blue links is a relatively common additional criterion that's added by consensus. It appears that there is consensus here. — hike395 ( talk) 11:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
All entries redirected. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 August 23. ✗ plicit 23:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
No albums, no singles, no members with articles. No improvement to navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 22:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 August 23. ✗ plicit 23:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Single-use. Substitute on CB Avenida. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Used on the wrong articles and no mainspace article for this template to be substituted on. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused roster list. Outdated as the main article, Basket Zaragoza has an up to date list as part of the article. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused with only one link and redundant to Template:PatriotsHOF. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 01:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused navbox with no mainspace article for the topic. There is no Cresta series that I could find that matches with the games listed. Other than the similarity of the titles. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Two links outside of the main article. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused timeline chart. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 00:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Per guidance at WP:CSC Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the near future. So, this notice forbidding all redlinks is in complete violation of guidance. I found it by clicking on the edit button of List of web directories, but the transclusions link above doesn't show it links to anything. As a side note, the criteria listed on the talk page also points exactly to CSC #1 guidance which allows the redlinks provided they have citations... Huggums537 ( talk) 18:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Ok, I just remembered why I went for outright deletion, and not just a discussion about amending redlinks. It is because the template also calls for every entry in the list to have a Wikipedia article against guidance, and there is probably just too much to amend here. The only guidance that allows for just Wikipedia articles only is WP:LISTPEOPLE, and this list is not about people. Establishing a list based on "Wikipedia articles only" violates WP:SELFREF, WP:CIRCULAR, MOS:OVERLINK, or more like MOS:SEAOFBLUE and WP:Blue Sea with a sea of blue, plus is not encyclopedic since it doesn't allow other notable entries such as redlinks, redirects, or other plain text notable mentions. There was also no prior consensus for restricting the list to "just Wikipedia articles only". There is a big difference between some of the suggestions for a "notable list", and that of a "Wikipedia articles only". Huggums537 ( talk) 19:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance, not just verifiable existence.Requiring blue links is a relatively common additional criterion that's added by consensus. It appears that there is consensus here. — hike395 ( talk) 11:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
All entries redirected. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 August 23. ✗ plicit 23:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)