The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused Hebrew letter templates that aren't needed anymore. Gonnym ( talk) 17:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Izno ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Used only on the creator's user page. This template has articles that are already featured in respective templates about the Israel-Palestine conflict or the Arab-Israeli conflict. Thus, the template is redundant and unlikely to be used outside user space. Although, userfying can be an acceptable alternative. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
All links are also included in Template:Ice hockey in Israel and both templates are on both pages. This one is redundant. Gonnym ( talk) 12:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Roster templates for defunct Israel Baseball League teams. Each only used once on that team's article. Template should be subst to that article and deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 11:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
No longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. As the only contributor to the template, I have chosen to delete it per CSD:G7. Stifle ( talk) 12:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I can safely assume that this template is no longer in use and has been replaced by another template. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
It has never been used and has no purpose. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 22. Izno ( talk) 21:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
No longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
With all the documents updated to the latest format, this template is not needed. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. While this is a subst-only template, the apparent past usage and this discussion's consensus seem to indicate that the template's low use indicates that it is not widely-used enough to merit keeping. I should mention for the record, though, that WikiCleanerMan was not the nominator of this draft, and should not receive grief for it. Primefac ( talk) 08:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused welcome template. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
copyleft encyclopedia that will always belong to everyone– first of all, this isn't technically true, the intellectual property of Wikipedia is not public domain, and the term copyleft is not widely known so is not helpful. Secondly, the main link in the template is to Wikipedia:Community portal, and while there's nothing wrong with the community portal, it's not the first thing new editors need to read. I don't think it's as useful as Template:Welcome, which links to actual tutorials like Help:Introduction which should help people get up to speed more quickly. User:GKFX talk 19:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Substitute and delete because the WP:NIQQUD has been solved. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in w3m by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Liferea by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Konversation by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in GnuCash by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in GNU Privacy Guard by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in FileZilla by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Dillo by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Amaya (web editor) by a Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused since 2007. This set of subpages was orphaned by this edit in 2007, and they do not appear to have been used since then. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 06:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused set of subtemplates. The parent template is used over 100 times; it appears that whatever these templates were intended to do, the functionality has been implemented in the parent template or in a related template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 06:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect to User:Mathglot/sandbox/Templates/Brazil glossary term with comment "Userfy with no redirect left behind, in consideration of [[WP:TFD#Template:Brazil glossary term]]." by Mathglot ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. May have a good merge target if it were used at Template:Glossary term. Izno ( talk) 00:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I actually thought...Of course that's how that works. :D I don't think we need these glossary sidebox templates at all. Either the glossary should exist in mainspace with appropriate linkage and redirects (modulo WP:NOTDICTIONARY), or (soft) redirects to Wiktionary should exist, or simply we should link Wiktionary directly. Or... the topics linked are actually suitable for an article or subtopic of some other article in which case it should be added with non-dictionary content. (Most likely some mix of the two.) Izno ( talk) 06:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 24. Primefac ( talk) 08:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Incubator. (non-admin closure) User:GKFX talk 22:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Used on only two pages for linking to incubator. Should probably use Template:Incubator multiple times if necessary. Izno ( talk) 00:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
Incubator}}
had a warning in its documentation that it should not be used multiple times on a page in favor of {{
Incubator multi}}
, that would seem to be the perfect way of bringing extra attention to those pages that should have that extra level of scrutiny.
Van
Isaac, MPLL
cont
WpWS
06:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused Hebrew letter templates that aren't needed anymore. Gonnym ( talk) 17:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Izno ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Used only on the creator's user page. This template has articles that are already featured in respective templates about the Israel-Palestine conflict or the Arab-Israeli conflict. Thus, the template is redundant and unlikely to be used outside user space. Although, userfying can be an acceptable alternative. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
All links are also included in Template:Ice hockey in Israel and both templates are on both pages. This one is redundant. Gonnym ( talk) 12:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Roster templates for defunct Israel Baseball League teams. Each only used once on that team's article. Template should be subst to that article and deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 11:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
No longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. As the only contributor to the template, I have chosen to delete it per CSD:G7. Stifle ( talk) 12:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I can safely assume that this template is no longer in use and has been replaced by another template. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
It has never been used and has no purpose. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 22. Izno ( talk) 21:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
No longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
With all the documents updated to the latest format, this template is not needed. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. While this is a subst-only template, the apparent past usage and this discussion's consensus seem to indicate that the template's low use indicates that it is not widely-used enough to merit keeping. I should mention for the record, though, that WikiCleanerMan was not the nominator of this draft, and should not receive grief for it. Primefac ( talk) 08:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused welcome template. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
copyleft encyclopedia that will always belong to everyone– first of all, this isn't technically true, the intellectual property of Wikipedia is not public domain, and the term copyleft is not widely known so is not helpful. Secondly, the main link in the template is to Wikipedia:Community portal, and while there's nothing wrong with the community portal, it's not the first thing new editors need to read. I don't think it's as useful as Template:Welcome, which links to actual tutorials like Help:Introduction which should help people get up to speed more quickly. User:GKFX talk 19:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 21:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Substitute and delete because the WP:NIQQUD has been solved. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in w3m by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Liferea by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Konversation by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in GnuCash by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in GNU Privacy Guard by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in FileZilla by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Dillo by Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused; replaced in Amaya (web editor) by a Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 07:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused since 2007. This set of subpages was orphaned by this edit in 2007, and they do not appear to have been used since then. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 06:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused set of subtemplates. The parent template is used over 100 times; it appears that whatever these templates were intended to do, the functionality has been implemented in the parent template or in a related template. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 06:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect to User:Mathglot/sandbox/Templates/Brazil glossary term with comment "Userfy with no redirect left behind, in consideration of [[WP:TFD#Template:Brazil glossary term]]." by Mathglot ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. May have a good merge target if it were used at Template:Glossary term. Izno ( talk) 00:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
I actually thought...Of course that's how that works. :D I don't think we need these glossary sidebox templates at all. Either the glossary should exist in mainspace with appropriate linkage and redirects (modulo WP:NOTDICTIONARY), or (soft) redirects to Wiktionary should exist, or simply we should link Wiktionary directly. Or... the topics linked are actually suitable for an article or subtopic of some other article in which case it should be added with non-dictionary content. (Most likely some mix of the two.) Izno ( talk) 06:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 24. Primefac ( talk) 08:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Incubator. (non-admin closure) User:GKFX talk 22:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Used on only two pages for linking to incubator. Should probably use Template:Incubator multiple times if necessary. Izno ( talk) 00:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
Incubator}}
had a warning in its documentation that it should not be used multiple times on a page in favor of {{
Incubator multi}}
, that would seem to be the perfect way of bringing extra attention to those pages that should have that extra level of scrutiny.
Van
Isaac, MPLL
cont
WpWS
06:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)