The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
All unused. Looks like data has been moved to other templates. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
All of these are unused. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 10. Izno ( talk) 00:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Not needed now as it has already been covered by the Argentina NFT template. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 19:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused even in the parent template. Might be a failed experiment. Gonnym ( talk) 15:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
{{if|error //// this provides a wrapping if for error handling to the {{if|1=version}} do-work statement |{{if|1=version|2=testobject|3=trueaction|4=falseaction)) //// this error test condition of the code's do-work statement |{{if/errmsg|t=if version|1=trueaction|2=falseaction|3=testobject}} //// this is the formatted error message //// this should be customized to indicate the breakpoint the code failed at |{{if|1=version|2=testobject|3=trueaction|4=falseaction)) //// this is the code's do-work statement }}
{{if|error|{{if|expr|4/0|true|false}}|{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 4/0 }} |{{if|expr|4/0|true|false}} }}
{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 4/0 }}
{{if|error|{{if|expr|1|true|false}}|{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 1 }}|{{if|expr|1|true|false}} }}
true
{{if|error|{{if|expr|0|true|false}}|{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 1 }}|{{if|expr|0|true|false}} }}
false
The result of the discussion was delete. Returned to user's space. Izno ( talk) 17:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused other than in a test page and a sandbox. The regular {{ Yesno}} template seems to be enough. Gonnym ( talk) 15:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused; and at this point probably won't be used. Also doesn't make sense to have a general edit notice like this - annoys people using VE especially and contributes to banner blindness. Elli ( talk | contribs) 09:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template; not sure what purpose this serves. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; not sure what purpose this serves. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was convert to be more obvious as a legend. There is (if you want to get bureaucratic about it) no consensus on whether to delete or delete this template, but the primary concern seems to be over whether this template is a "legend"-type template. By converting this to a template (with {{ vte}} and other sundries used) it will be more obvious as a legend. That being said, there is no prejudice against renomination if and when this is complete and those opposed feel that (as a legend-style template) it is inadequate (not just that "it is article text in the template space"). Primefac ( talk) 17:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I do not understand why this template was ever even created. Its existence makes it more difficult for readers to edit the article on lunar eclipses, and I have now transferred the information within it to that article and removed the template from it. I've never seen this in a Wikipedia article before. A loose necktie ( talk) 14:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
All unused. Looks like data has been moved to other templates. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
All of these are unused. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 10. Izno ( talk) 00:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Not needed now as it has already been covered by the Argentina NFT template. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 19:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 09:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused even in the parent template. Might be a failed experiment. Gonnym ( talk) 15:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
{{if|error //// this provides a wrapping if for error handling to the {{if|1=version}} do-work statement |{{if|1=version|2=testobject|3=trueaction|4=falseaction)) //// this error test condition of the code's do-work statement |{{if/errmsg|t=if version|1=trueaction|2=falseaction|3=testobject}} //// this is the formatted error message //// this should be customized to indicate the breakpoint the code failed at |{{if|1=version|2=testobject|3=trueaction|4=falseaction)) //// this is the code's do-work statement }}
{{if|error|{{if|expr|4/0|true|false}}|{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 4/0 }} |{{if|expr|4/0|true|false}} }}
{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 4/0 }}
{{if|error|{{if|expr|1|true|false}}|{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 1 }}|{{if|expr|1|true|false}} }}
true
{{if|error|{{if|expr|0|true|false}}|{{if/errmsg|t=expr|1= true printout |2= false printout |3= 1 }}|{{if|expr|0|true|false}} }}
false
The result of the discussion was delete. Returned to user's space. Izno ( talk) 17:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused other than in a test page and a sandbox. The regular {{ Yesno}} template seems to be enough. Gonnym ( talk) 15:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused; and at this point probably won't be used. Also doesn't make sense to have a general edit notice like this - annoys people using VE especially and contributes to banner blindness. Elli ( talk | contribs) 09:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template; not sure what purpose this serves. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; not sure what purpose this serves. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Drmies ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused template in mainspace; does not appear to have any additional benefits from existing templates. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was convert to be more obvious as a legend. There is (if you want to get bureaucratic about it) no consensus on whether to delete or delete this template, but the primary concern seems to be over whether this template is a "legend"-type template. By converting this to a template (with {{ vte}} and other sundries used) it will be more obvious as a legend. That being said, there is no prejudice against renomination if and when this is complete and those opposed feel that (as a legend-style template) it is inadequate (not just that "it is article text in the template space"). Primefac ( talk) 17:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I do not understand why this template was ever even created. Its existence makes it more difficult for readers to edit the article on lunar eclipses, and I have now transferred the information within it to that article and removed the template from it. I've never seen this in a Wikipedia article before. A loose necktie ( talk) 14:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)