The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused leftovers which are no longer needed per this discussion. Gonnym ( talk) 20:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused and from what I can tell can be wrapped into the calling module where appropriate. Izno ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 7. Primefac ( talk) 10:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no evidence that any written standard of Nepali English exists, as distinct from other varieties, and the article on the subject itself says that no one in the country can agree on a standard, so this template serves no purpose whatsoever. Furthermore, there is no evidence that anyone has written an article in such a variety. Therefore, I propose it be deleted. RGloucester — ☎ 12:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no identifiable written standard variety of 'Pitcairn Islands English' that exists, and certainly, no evidence that any article is written in such a variety. Therefore, I propose this template be deleted. RGloucester — ☎ 12:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Primefac ( talk) 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Only two individuals are linked, leaving the template with limited usefulness. 67.173.23.66 ( talk) 23:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Primefac ( talk) 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Only three individuals are linked, leaving the template with limited usefulness. 67.173.23.66 ( talk) 23:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused leftovers which are no longer needed per this discussion. Gonnym ( talk) 20:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused and from what I can tell can be wrapped into the calling module where appropriate. Izno ( talk) 16:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 7. Primefac ( talk) 10:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no evidence that any written standard of Nepali English exists, as distinct from other varieties, and the article on the subject itself says that no one in the country can agree on a standard, so this template serves no purpose whatsoever. Furthermore, there is no evidence that anyone has written an article in such a variety. Therefore, I propose it be deleted. RGloucester — ☎ 12:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
There is no identifiable written standard variety of 'Pitcairn Islands English' that exists, and certainly, no evidence that any article is written in such a variety. Therefore, I propose this template be deleted. RGloucester — ☎ 12:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Primefac ( talk) 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Only two individuals are linked, leaving the template with limited usefulness. 67.173.23.66 ( talk) 23:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Primefac ( talk) 10:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Only three individuals are linked, leaving the template with limited usefulness. 67.173.23.66 ( talk) 23:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)