From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused MediaWiki message qualify for speedy deletion under G6, and thus should be deleted (and their talk pages deleted as G8) instead of being tagged with this template. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 14:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Per per Template:Infobox song § Track listing examples: An album track listing may be added to infobox song as long as the following criteria are met: 1) the article does not have a navbox in which the song appears; and.... Since there is an A Star is Born navbox this template is redundant and discouraged from use in the infobox Lil-℧niquԐ1 - ( Talk) - 14:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:2020 coronavirus pandemic curfews with Template:2020 coronavirus pandemic lockdowns.
Both template list curfew and lockdown measures. Either merge the two or strictly separate lockdowns and curfews. MB-one ( talk) 07:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

A merger would achieve nothing as all of the information in curfews template is already stated in the lockdowns template, apart from the aforementioned column. Deletion would be a better approach. -- Shawnqual ( talk) 08:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Shawnqual once we have certainty, that all relevant information from both templates are included in one, deletion of the other, would be the next step. So there's not really a disagreement here. But after a rough inspection, the "curfew" list actually includes more detailed information regarding certain countries. This information should be transferred to the "lockdown" list first. -- MB-one ( talk) 09:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 01:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 00:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Shortcut. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 20:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Module:Shortcut/policy and Module:Shortcut/further with Module:Shortcut.
There's absolutely no need to force the user to write a hacky wrapper module for every custom shortcut prefix, as opposed to supporting it as a parameter in the main module. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply

I just created Module:Shortcut/further; this was quick haha. No objection to merging it if that can be done while retaining the functionality; basically all I'm trying to do is use a custom title instead of "shortcuts" and have the redirects go through. You can see what I'm trying to get to work at Help:Introduction to the Manual of Style/5. (I just noticed the redirect thing, though, and I'm not sure how to deal with that; is that fixable?) Cheers, {{u| Sdkb}} talk 22:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Not with the current design of the module, although if this gets implemented I may implement that feature too. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Coding that is a little beyond my current abilities, so if you'd be able to do that, that would be wonderful. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 23:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Actually,  Done, albeit very hackily. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 00:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 07:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused MediaWiki message qualify for speedy deletion under G6, and thus should be deleted (and their talk pages deleted as G8) instead of being tagged with this template. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 14:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Per per Template:Infobox song § Track listing examples: An album track listing may be added to infobox song as long as the following criteria are met: 1) the article does not have a navbox in which the song appears; and.... Since there is an A Star is Born navbox this template is redundant and discouraged from use in the infobox Lil-℧niquԐ1 - ( Talk) - 14:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Template:2020 coronavirus pandemic curfews with Template:2020 coronavirus pandemic lockdowns.
Both template list curfew and lockdown measures. Either merge the two or strictly separate lockdowns and curfews. MB-one ( talk) 07:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

A merger would achieve nothing as all of the information in curfews template is already stated in the lockdowns template, apart from the aforementioned column. Deletion would be a better approach. -- Shawnqual ( talk) 08:12, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Shawnqual once we have certainty, that all relevant information from both templates are included in one, deletion of the other, would be the next step. So there's not really a disagreement here. But after a rough inspection, the "curfew" list actually includes more detailed information regarding certain countries. This information should be transferred to the "lockdown" list first. -- MB-one ( talk) 09:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 01:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 00:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Shortcut. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 20:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Propose merging Module:Shortcut/policy and Module:Shortcut/further with Module:Shortcut.
There's absolutely no need to force the user to write a hacky wrapper module for every custom shortcut prefix, as opposed to supporting it as a parameter in the main module. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply

I just created Module:Shortcut/further; this was quick haha. No objection to merging it if that can be done while retaining the functionality; basically all I'm trying to do is use a custom title instead of "shortcuts" and have the redirects go through. You can see what I'm trying to get to work at Help:Introduction to the Manual of Style/5. (I just noticed the redirect thing, though, and I'm not sure how to deal with that; is that fixable?) Cheers, {{u| Sdkb}} talk 22:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Not with the current design of the module, although if this gets implemented I may implement that feature too. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Coding that is a little beyond my current abilities, so if you'd be able to do that, that would be wonderful. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 23:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Actually,  Done, albeit very hackily. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 00:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook