The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 2. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation provided they actually contain useful content. Primefac ( talk) 01:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
I think these templates should be deleted because they each have less than four wikilinks and redlinks combined. I would rather prefer if these navboxes were instead merged with the main navbox for each of these clubs. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 23:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
::Trialpears as the closer of this discussion. How should templates like {{ Pyramids FC matches}} be handled? There is no club navbox. Should these be deleted or renamed? -- Gonnym ( talk) 10:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have also been wondering that ever since I took care of the templates that did meet the close criteria. While I will obviously wait for their reply, my thought would be to re-open and then relist the discussion with the remaining templates. Primefac ( talk) 00:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Since there wasn't any discussion about the ones without corresponding templates there is no consensus as to what to do with them. I suggest a new TfD for these. Courtesy ping to nominator KingSkyLord. ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 17:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't know what to do. You can create general navboxes for all the clubs except for the Australian youth teams. That seems a little ridicoulous. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 19:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused, and not even presented as a standard matrix-style addition table anyway. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 01:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 2. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation provided they actually contain useful content. Primefac ( talk) 01:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
I think these templates should be deleted because they each have less than four wikilinks and redlinks combined. I would rather prefer if these navboxes were instead merged with the main navbox for each of these clubs. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 23:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
::Trialpears as the closer of this discussion. How should templates like {{ Pyramids FC matches}} be handled? There is no club navbox. Should these be deleted or renamed? -- Gonnym ( talk) 10:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have also been wondering that ever since I took care of the templates that did meet the close criteria. While I will obviously wait for their reply, my thought would be to re-open and then relist the discussion with the remaining templates. Primefac ( talk) 00:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Since there wasn't any discussion about the ones without corresponding templates there is no consensus as to what to do with them. I suggest a new TfD for these. Courtesy ping to nominator KingSkyLord. ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 17:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't know what to do. You can create general navboxes for all the clubs except for the Australian youth teams. That seems a little ridicoulous. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 19:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Unused, and not even presented as a standard matrix-style addition table anyway. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 01:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)