From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

not needed per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes ( talk) 22:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Currently unused, seems not very useful anymore. TheImaCow ( talk) 09:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow ( talk) 09:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused message from 2010. TheImaCow ( talk) 08:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore) TheImaCow ( talk) 08:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused, "work in progress" since 8 years. TheImaCow ( talk) 08:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Protection template redirects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

All ot them are cuttently unused, and, since everyone uses Twinkle to add Protection-Templates, they'll probably stay unused. (notice: all of them were created in 2006-8) TheImaCow ( talk) 06:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. It is complicated enough here without this array of similarly intended and unused templates. Better to delete and, if really required at some future date (unlikely given things have become more systematised since their creation), they can be recreated. -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a procedural renomination of this template following no actual discussion of this template at the previous deletion discussion, which focused mainly on {{ ship event row}}. The nomination was based on the template being unused and convoluted, the former being not true and the latter potentially contended by the original nominator. Primefac ( talk) 20:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment - I didn't say it was unused. I thought it was unused unless it was also used with ship event row. If that is not the case, then this template can be kept as it was not the template causing issues. Mjroots ( talk) 04:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert ( talk) 23:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 01:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

not needed per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes ( talk) 22:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Currently unused, seems not very useful anymore. TheImaCow ( talk) 09:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow ( talk) 09:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused message from 2010. TheImaCow ( talk) 08:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore) TheImaCow ( talk) 08:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused, "work in progress" since 8 years. TheImaCow ( talk) 08:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Protection template redirects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 12:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

All ot them are cuttently unused, and, since everyone uses Twinkle to add Protection-Templates, they'll probably stay unused. (notice: all of them were created in 2006-8) TheImaCow ( talk) 06:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. It is complicated enough here without this array of similarly intended and unused templates. Better to delete and, if really required at some future date (unlikely given things have become more systematised since their creation), they can be recreated. -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 08:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a procedural renomination of this template following no actual discussion of this template at the previous deletion discussion, which focused mainly on {{ ship event row}}. The nomination was based on the template being unused and convoluted, the former being not true and the latter potentially contended by the original nominator. Primefac ( talk) 20:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment - I didn't say it was unused. I thought it was unused unless it was also used with ship event row. If that is not the case, then this template can be kept as it was not the template causing issues. Mjroots ( talk) 04:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert ( talk) 23:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 01:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook