The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
After a series of AfDs, all entries except Music of the Ainur redirect to History of Arda. No longer useful for navigation. BenKuykendall ( talk) 23:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 18:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a squad for a minor tournament and the team in question is not even the senior representative side for its country. It is highly unlikely that readers will have heard of this competition, let alone want to link between different members of this squad. – Pee Jay 12:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete pending the outcome of this related AFD. Should the AFD result in a "keep" or otherwise still be present, this discussion should be revisited. If the page is to be kept as a WikiProject or User-space subpage, then I see no reason why they could not be subst' onto the page and then deleted. Primefac ( talk) 15:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 22#Independents football records templates prior to 1956, it was determined that these templates should be broken up by geographical region, which has now been done. See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 23#NCAA independents football records for successful deletion of similar templates. Jweiss11 ( talk) 19:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes ( talk) 16:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Atschool. Primefac ( talk) 23:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:University wikibreak and
Template:Education wikibreak with
Template:College wikibreak.
Very similar purpose and content; very minor wording difference that can be accounted for by a parameter if needed.
Or we could replace all three with {{ Atschool}}, and delete them.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
{{
Atschool}}
and I'm fine with that result, too. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
05:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)The result of the discussion was NA. Notice given, nothing more to do here Primefac ( talk) 16:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Redirects from route numbers and Template:R from route number have been nominated for possible deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 10:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:R to anchor. Primefac ( talk) 00:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC) Clarification: this merge will result in one template that will not auto-assess the printworthyness of the redirect, but also allow for a parameter to set it. Primefac ( talk) 16:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:R to anchor 2 to
Template:R to anchor.
The only difference between these templates (which is not documented anywhere) is that the "2" version removes this parameter code: |printworthy={{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|printworthy|yes|no}}
. The effect of that code is to auto-categorize a redirect as unprintworthy if it is not specifically flagged as printworthy. Given discussions like
Wikipedia talk:Categorizing redirects#Printworthiness and several prior ones, it's become clear that robotic auto-assessment of things as printworthy or not isn't practical and is undesirable. Thus, either this line should be removed from the base template or it should at least be changed to |printworthy={{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|printworthy|yes}}
. If the latter, then probably also remove documentation of this parameter so people stop using it over time, or annotate it as explicitly deprecated, since we are using separate {{
R printworthy}}
and {{
R unprintworthy}}
templates, and there's a proposal (at the above-linked thread) to build this feature also into {{
Rcat shell}}
. It's not practical to do this on an rcat-template by rcat-template basis with rather randomly configured code that other editors are inspired to try to
WP:TEMPLATEFORK their way around. Regardless, there is no reason to have both a template that auto-unprintworthy-izes unless forced not to, and an "anti" version that thwarts it. The correct behavior is not auto-guessing printworthiness, and we only need one template for that. PS: This rcat merge does not implicate any categories, so I'm using TfD not CfD. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
09:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
{{
Yesno}}
to detect other positive values like "Y" or "true"), and otherwise leave the parameter blank, instead of forcing it "no". Notification: I just forgot; I've been doing a spate of rcat cleanup nominations between CfD and TfD, and apparently just lost track of it all. I know we've had an argument today at another page, but I promise this was not intentional. Anyway, peeps from WPREDIRECT seem to be changing their tune lately about auto-catting as [un]printworthy. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
13:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect notified of this TfM. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 13:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was NA. Notice given, nothing more to do here. Primefac ( talk) 16:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Redirects from catchphrases (and Template:R from catchphrase) have been nominated for merging with Category:Redirects from slogans (and Template:R from slogan, respectively). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the categories' and templates' entry at Categories for discussion. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 18:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Only three articles. ミラ P 04:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
After a series of AfDs, all entries except Music of the Ainur redirect to History of Arda. No longer useful for navigation. BenKuykendall ( talk) 23:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 18:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a squad for a minor tournament and the team in question is not even the senior representative side for its country. It is highly unlikely that readers will have heard of this competition, let alone want to link between different members of this squad. – Pee Jay 12:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete pending the outcome of this related AFD. Should the AFD result in a "keep" or otherwise still be present, this discussion should be revisited. If the page is to be kept as a WikiProject or User-space subpage, then I see no reason why they could not be subst' onto the page and then deleted. Primefac ( talk) 15:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Archive 22#Independents football records templates prior to 1956, it was determined that these templates should be broken up by geographical region, which has now been done. See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 23#NCAA independents football records for successful deletion of similar templates. Jweiss11 ( talk) 19:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 18:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes ( talk) 16:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Atschool. Primefac ( talk) 23:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:University wikibreak and
Template:Education wikibreak with
Template:College wikibreak.
Very similar purpose and content; very minor wording difference that can be accounted for by a parameter if needed.
Or we could replace all three with {{ Atschool}}, and delete them.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
{{
Atschool}}
and I'm fine with that result, too. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
05:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)The result of the discussion was NA. Notice given, nothing more to do here Primefac ( talk) 16:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Redirects from route numbers and Template:R from route number have been nominated for possible deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 10:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:R to anchor. Primefac ( talk) 00:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC) Clarification: this merge will result in one template that will not auto-assess the printworthyness of the redirect, but also allow for a parameter to set it. Primefac ( talk) 16:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:R to anchor 2 to
Template:R to anchor.
The only difference between these templates (which is not documented anywhere) is that the "2" version removes this parameter code: |printworthy={{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|printworthy|yes|no}}
. The effect of that code is to auto-categorize a redirect as unprintworthy if it is not specifically flagged as printworthy. Given discussions like
Wikipedia talk:Categorizing redirects#Printworthiness and several prior ones, it's become clear that robotic auto-assessment of things as printworthy or not isn't practical and is undesirable. Thus, either this line should be removed from the base template or it should at least be changed to |printworthy={{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|printworthy|yes}}
. If the latter, then probably also remove documentation of this parameter so people stop using it over time, or annotate it as explicitly deprecated, since we are using separate {{
R printworthy}}
and {{
R unprintworthy}}
templates, and there's a proposal (at the above-linked thread) to build this feature also into {{
Rcat shell}}
. It's not practical to do this on an rcat-template by rcat-template basis with rather randomly configured code that other editors are inspired to try to
WP:TEMPLATEFORK their way around. Regardless, there is no reason to have both a template that auto-unprintworthy-izes unless forced not to, and an "anti" version that thwarts it. The correct behavior is not auto-guessing printworthiness, and we only need one template for that. PS: This rcat merge does not implicate any categories, so I'm using TfD not CfD. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
09:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
{{
Yesno}}
to detect other positive values like "Y" or "true"), and otherwise leave the parameter blank, instead of forcing it "no". Notification: I just forgot; I've been doing a spate of rcat cleanup nominations between CfD and TfD, and apparently just lost track of it all. I know we've had an argument today at another page, but I promise this was not intentional. Anyway, peeps from WPREDIRECT seem to be changing their tune lately about auto-catting as [un]printworthy. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
13:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Redirect notified of this TfM. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 13:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was NA. Notice given, nothing more to do here. Primefac ( talk) 16:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Redirects from catchphrases (and Template:R from catchphrase) have been nominated for merging with Category:Redirects from slogans (and Template:R from slogan, respectively). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the categories' and templates' entry at Categories for discussion. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 18:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Only three articles. ミラ P 04:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)