- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:StagecoachGold ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Dragon_Ball_films ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Inner Planes ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
D&D cosmology template not used in article space. Additionally, this is fundamentally a navbox that consists exclusively of external links in contravention of policy. Because the trend is toward less in-depth coverage of purely in-universe fictional content, rather than more, it is unlikely that this specific template has any further benefit. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 14:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad in so many ways. -- Gonnym ( talk) 07:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - prior to this change earlier this year, the template essentially navigated nothing as teh articles did not exist. After the change, it became an external link farm. Neither version is useful. -- Whpq ( talk) 14:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Somehow I missed that there was a live use of this in article space. We may be back here in future, but for now, this was premature. My apologies. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 16:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:D&DCreatList ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Abbreviated version of Template:D&D creature list, and not used in article space. Because the trend is toward less in-depth coverage of purely in-universe fictional content, rather than more, it is unlikely that this specific template has any further benefit. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 14:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This template is used by List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. That page will no longer work it this template is deleted. So as long as that page is exists (its deletion was discussed and rejected recently), let's please keep the template. Daranios ( talk) 15:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
This template violates
WP:NOTFORUM: "article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles
". The template's apparent intended purpose is to be added to the talk pages but it does not contribute to the improvement of our encyclopedia. The project
Wikipedia:Questionable Cabal/Questionable Article Award only appears to have a humorous intent which I guess is permitted. However, using templates to tag articles which the project (satirically?) considers "Questionable" is not beneficial to our mission. ---
Coffeeand
crumbs
13:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Honestly, if that's a problem I have no problem changing how QC does the awarding process. If your going to delete this template, might as well delete
Category:Questionable,
Template:Questionable.
Upsidedown Keyboard
(
talk)
13:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC) - Comment:
Template:Awarded Questionable has been deprecated and all use cases removed, it is safe to delete.
Upsidedown Keyboard
(
talk)
13:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and multiple prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:2013–14 Football League Championship table ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2014–15 Football League Championship table ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2014–15 Swiss Super League table ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes ( talk) 12:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Giant Snowman 09:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
navigation template for a prize deemed not notable (i.e. without an own article). The Banner talk 09:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: The category award not having an article is not because it is not notable. Category awards can be created if the parent award is notable, which this is. But I do agree, that if the specific award does not have an article, then there should not be a navigation template. First create the article, then the navigation template. That means that I do not oppose any future resurrection of this template. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Checked quite a few of the links in the navbox and none of them mentioned the award. ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 07:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:StagecoachGold ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Dragon_Ball_films ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Inner Planes ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
D&D cosmology template not used in article space. Additionally, this is fundamentally a navbox that consists exclusively of external links in contravention of policy. Because the trend is toward less in-depth coverage of purely in-universe fictional content, rather than more, it is unlikely that this specific template has any further benefit. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 14:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad in so many ways. -- Gonnym ( talk) 07:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - prior to this change earlier this year, the template essentially navigated nothing as teh articles did not exist. After the change, it became an external link farm. Neither version is useful. -- Whpq ( talk) 14:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Somehow I missed that there was a live use of this in article space. We may be back here in future, but for now, this was premature. My apologies. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 16:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:D&DCreatList ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Abbreviated version of Template:D&D creature list, and not used in article space. Because the trend is toward less in-depth coverage of purely in-universe fictional content, rather than more, it is unlikely that this specific template has any further benefit. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 14:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: This template is used by List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. That page will no longer work it this template is deleted. So as long as that page is exists (its deletion was discussed and rejected recently), let's please keep the template. Daranios ( talk) 15:58, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
This template violates
WP:NOTFORUM: "article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles
". The template's apparent intended purpose is to be added to the talk pages but it does not contribute to the improvement of our encyclopedia. The project
Wikipedia:Questionable Cabal/Questionable Article Award only appears to have a humorous intent which I guess is permitted. However, using templates to tag articles which the project (satirically?) considers "Questionable" is not beneficial to our mission. ---
Coffeeand
crumbs
13:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Honestly, if that's a problem I have no problem changing how QC does the awarding process. If your going to delete this template, might as well delete
Category:Questionable,
Template:Questionable.
Upsidedown Keyboard
(
talk)
13:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment:
Template:Awarded Questionable has been deprecated and all use cases removed, it is safe to delete.
Upsidedown Keyboard
(
talk)
13:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and multiple prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Template:2013–14 Football League Championship table ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2014–15 Football League Championship table ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2014–15 Swiss Super League table ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes ( talk) 12:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Giant Snowman 09:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
navigation template for a prize deemed not notable (i.e. without an own article). The Banner talk 09:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: The category award not having an article is not because it is not notable. Category awards can be created if the parent award is notable, which this is. But I do agree, that if the specific award does not have an article, then there should not be a navigation template. First create the article, then the navigation template. That means that I do not oppose any future resurrection of this template. -- Gonnym ( talk) 14:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Checked quite a few of the links in the navbox and none of them mentioned the award. ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 07:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).